Outcomes and Costs for Major Lung Resection in the United States: Which Patients Benefit Most From High-Volume Referral?

Background Accountable care organizations are designed to improve value by decreasing costs and maintaining quality. Strategies to maximize value are needed for high-risk surgery. We wanted to understand whether certain patient groups were differentially associated with better outcomes at high-volum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 100; no. 3; pp. 939 - 946
Main Authors Wakeam, Elliot, MD, MPH, Hyder, Joseph A., MD, PhD, Lipsitz, Stuart R., PhD, Darling, Gail E., MD, FRCSC, Finlayson, Samuel R.G., MD, MPH
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Accountable care organizations are designed to improve value by decreasing costs and maintaining quality. Strategies to maximize value are needed for high-risk surgery. We wanted to understand whether certain patient groups were differentially associated with better outcomes at high-volume hospitals in terms of quality and cost. Methods In all, 37,746 patients underwent elective major lung resection in 1,273 hospitals in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2007 to 2011. Patients were stratified by hospital volume quartile and substratified by preoperative mortality risk, age, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status. Mortality was evaluated using clustered multivariable hierarchical logistic regression controlling for patient comorbidity, demographics, and procedure. Adjusted cost was evaluated using generalized linear models fit to a gamma distribution. Results Patients were grouped into volume quartiles based on cases per year (less than 21, 21 to 40, 40 to 78, and more than 78). Patient characteristics and procedure mix differed across quartiles. Overall, mortality decreased across volume quartiles (lowest 1.9% versus highest 1.1%, p  < 0.0001). Patients aged more than 80 years were associated with greater absolute and relative mortality rates than patients less than 60 years old in highest volume versus lowest volume hospitals (age more than 80 years, 4.2% versus 1.3%, p < 0.0001, odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.89 to 5.80; age less than 60 years, 1.0% versus 0.8%, p  = 0.19, odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.56). Patients with high preoperative risk (more than 75th percentile) were also associated with lower absolute mortality in high-volume hospitals. Adjusted costs were not significantly different across quartiles or patient strata. Conclusions Older patients show a significantly stronger volume-outcome relationship than patients less than 60 years of age. Costs were equivalent across volume quartile and patient strata. Selective patient referral may be a strategy to improve outcomes for elderly patients undergoing lung resection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.076