A Defined Management Strategy Improves Early Outcomes After the Fontan Procedure: The Portland Protocol

Background Patients undergoing the Fontan procedure may have extended hospital stay due to various postoperative factors including prolonged chest tube drainage. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of our Fontan management protocol in reducing chest tube drainage and length of stay. Methods Patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 99; no. 1; pp. 148 - 155
Main Authors Sunstrom, Rachel E., PA-C, Muralidaran, Ashok, MD, Gerrah, Rabin, MD, Reed, Richard D., PA-C, Good, Milon K., MPH, Armsby, Laurie R., MD, Rekito, Andrew J., MS, Zubair, M. Mujeeb, MD, Langley, Stephen M., MD, FRCS (CTh)
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Patients undergoing the Fontan procedure may have extended hospital stay due to various postoperative factors including prolonged chest tube drainage. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of our Fontan management protocol in reducing chest tube drainage and length of stay. Methods Patients who underwent a Fontan procedure at our institution from June 2008 to September 2013 were analyzed (n = 42). We currently manage our patients according to the PORTLAND protocol: Peripheral vasodilation, Oxygen, Restriction of fluids, Technique of surgery, Low-fat diet, Anticoagulation (including antithrombin III management), No ventilator, and Diuretics. Group A (n = 28) had surgery prior to initiation of this protocol; group B (n = 14) had surgery during the current protocol era. Results The median number of chest tube days was lower in group B (6 vs 11 days, p < 0.001) as was the total indexed drainage (126 vs 259 mL/kg, p < 0.001). Patients in group B had shorter intensive care unit length of stay (4 vs 7 days, p  = 0.004) and hospital length of stay (8 vs 13 days,  p  = 0.001). Group B had higher preoperative common atrial pressures (7.0 vs 5.8 mm Hg, p  = 0.017), end-diastolic pressures (9 vs 7 mm Hg, p  = 0.026), and trended toward higher pulmonary artery pressures (11.5 vs 9.5 mm Hg, p  = 0.077). There was no statistically significant difference in age, weight, transpulmonary gradient, or pulmonary vascular resistance between groups. Conclusions The PORTLAND protocol has improved early outcomes after the Fontan procedure. Chest tube drainage and duration, and both intensive care unit and hospital length of stay have been reduced since initiation of this protocol.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.121