Impact of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea on acute care length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission: A multicenter retrospective study of inpatients, 2009-2011

• Published in: American journal of infection control Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 1148 - 1153
• Main Authors: Magee, Glenn, MBA, Strauss, Marcie E., MPH, Thomas, Sheila M., PharmD, Brown, Harold, MHA, MBA, Baumer, Dorothy, MS, Broderick, Kelly C., PharmD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2015; Mosby-Year Book, Inc
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bacteria; Bacterial infections; Clostridium difficile; Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification; Clostridium difficile infection; Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; Clostridium Infections - economics; Clostridium Infections - epidemiology; Clostridium Infections - mortality; Cost; Diarrhea; Diarrhea - economics; Diarrhea - epidemiology; Diarrhea - mortality; Economic impact; Female; Hospital Costs; Hospitals; Humans; Infection Control; Infectious Disease; Inpatients; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission - economics; Preventive medicine; Readmission; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; United States - epidemiology; Young Adult; United States; United States > US; Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; Readmission; Clostridium difficile infection; Cost; Clostridium difficile; Length of stay
• ISSN: 0196-6553; 1527-3296
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.004

Background The recent epidemiologic changes of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea (CDAD) have resulted in substantial economic burden to U.S. acute care hospitals. Past studies evaluating CDAD-attributable costs have been geographically and demographically limited. Here, we describe CDAD-attributable burden in inpatients, overall, and in vulnerable subpopulations from the Premier hospital database, a large, diverse cohort with a wide range of high-risk subgroups. Methods Discharges from the Premier database were retrospectively analyzed to assess length of stay (LOS), total inpatient costs, readmission, and inpatient mortality. Results Patients with CDAD had significantly worse outcomes than matched controls in terms of total LOS, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and inpatient mortality. After adjustment for risk factors, patients with CDAD had increased odds of inpatient mortality, total and ICU LOS, costs, and odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission versus non-CDAD patients. CDAD-attributable costs were higher in all studied vulnerable subpopulations, which also had increased odds of 30-, 60- and 90-day all-cause readmission than those without CDAD. Conclusion Given the significant economic impact CDAD has on hospitals, prevention of initial episodes and targeted therapy to prevent recurrences in vulnerable patients are essential to decrease the overall burden to hospitals.