Role of the Diamagnetic Zinc(II) Ion in Determining the Electronic Structure of Lanthanide Single‐Ion Magnets

• Published in: Chemistry : a European journal Vol. 23; no. 20; pp. 4903 - 4916
• Main Authors: Upadhyay, Apoorva, Das, Chinmoy, Vaidya, Shefali, Singh, Saurabh Kumar, Gupta, Tulika, Mondol, Ranajit, Langley, Stuart K., Murray, Keith S., Rajaraman, Gopalan, Shanmugam, Maheswaran
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 06.04.2017
• Subjects: ab initio calculations; Anisotropy; Barriers; Chemistry; clusters; Diamagnetism; dysprosium; Electronic structure; Magnetic properties; Mathematical analysis; praseodymium; single-ion magnets; Synthesis (chemistry); Zinc; dysprosium; single-ion magnets; ab initio calculations; magnetic properties; praseodymium; clusters
• ISSN: 0947-6539; 1521-3765
• DOI: 10.1002/chem.201700399

Four complexes containing DyIII and PrIII ions and their LnIII–ZnII analogs have been synthesized in order to study the influence that a diamagnetic ZnII ion has on the electronic structure and hence, the magnetic properties of the DyIII and PrIII single ions. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction revealed the molecular structures as [DyIII(HL)2(NO3)3] (1), [PrIII(HL)2(NO3)3] (2), [ZnIIDyIII(L)2(CH3CO2)(NO3)2] (3) and [ZnII2PrIII(L)2(CH3CO2)4(NO3)] (4) (where HL=2‐methoxy‐6‐[(E)‐phenyliminomethyl]phenol). The dc and ac magnetic data were collected for all four complexes. Compounds 1 and 3 display frequency dependent out‐of‐phase susceptibility signals (χM“), which is a characteristic signature for a single‐molecule magnet (SMM). Although 1 and 3 are chemically similar, a fivefold increase in the anisotropic barrier (Ueff) is observed experimentally for 3 (83 cm−1), compared to 1 (16 cm−1). To rationalize the larger anisotropic barrier (1 vs. 3), detailed ab initio calculations were performed. Although the ground state Kramer's doublet in both 1 and 3 are axial in nature (gzz=19.443 for 1 and 18.82 for 3), a significant difference in the energy gap (Ueff) between the ground and first excited Kramer's doublet is calculated. This energy gap is governed by the electrostatic repulsion between the DyIII ion and the additional charge density found for the phenoxo bridging ligand in 3. This extra charge density was found to be a consequence of the presence of the diamagnetic ZnII ion present in the complex. To explore the influence of diamagnetic ions on the magnetic properties further, previously reported and structurally related Zn–DyIII complexes were analyzed. These structurally analogous complexes unambiguously suggest that the electrostatic repulsion is found to be maximal when the Zn‐O‐Dy‐O dihedral angle is small, which is an ideal condition to maximize the anisotropic barrier in DyIII complexes. Kramer vs. Kramer: Two lanthanide monomers with the general molecular formula of [LnIII(HL)2(NO3)3] (where Ln=Dy (1) or Pr (2)) and their heterometallic zinc congeners were synthesized with the formula [ZnDy(L)2(NO3)2(CH3COO)] (3) and [Zn2Pr(L)2(CH3COO)4(NO3)] (4). The dc and ac data were collected on complexes 1–4. Detailed ac data analysis of 1 and 3 reveals the presence of a fivefold increase in effective energy barrier of 3 as compared to 1, which has been rationalized by Molcas calculations.