Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration

► We study how cultural metacognition influence creative collaboration in dyads. ► High cultural metacognition in dyads engenders affect-based trust and creativity. ► Affect-based trust mediates effects of cultural metacognition on creativity. We propose that managers adept at thinking about their c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 118; no. 2; pp. 116 - 131
Main Authors Chua, Roy Y.J., Morris, Michael W., Mor, Shira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Inc 01.07.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We study how cultural metacognition influence creative collaboration in dyads. ► High cultural metacognition in dyads engenders affect-based trust and creativity. ► Affect-based trust mediates effects of cultural metacognition on creativity. We propose that managers adept at thinking about their cultural assumptions (cultural metacognition) are more likely than others to develop affect-based trust in their relationships with people from different cultures, enabling creative collaboration. Study 1, a multi-rater assessment of managerial performance, found that managers higher in metacognitive cultural intelligence (CQ) were rated as more effective in intercultural creative collaboration by managers from other cultures. Study 2, a social network survey, found that managers lower in metacognitive CQ engaged in less sharing of new ideas in their intercultural ties but not intracultural ties. Study 3 required participants to work collaboratively with a non-acquaintance from another culture and found that higher metacognitive CQ engendered greater idea sharing and creative performance, so long as they were allowed a personal conversation prior to the task. The effects of metacognitive CQ in enhancing creative collaboration were mediated by affect-based trust in Studies 2 and 3.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.009