Terminology of metal–organic frameworks and coordination polymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)
A set of terms, definitions, and recommendations is provided for use in the classification of coordination polymers, networks, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). A hierarchical terminology is recommended in which the most general term is coordination polymer. Coordination networks are a subset of...
Saved in:
Published in | Pure and applied chemistry Vol. 85; no. 8; pp. 1715 - 1724 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin
De Gruyter
01.01.2013
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A set of terms, definitions, and recommendations is provided for use in the
classification of coordination polymers, networks, and metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs). A hierarchical terminology is recommended in which the most general term
is coordination polymer. Coordination networks are a subset of coordination
polymers and MOFs a further subset of coordination networks. One of the criteria
an MOF needs to fulfill is that it contains potential voids, but no physical
measurements of porosity or other properties are demanded per se. The use of
topology and topology descriptors to enhance the description of crystal
structures of MOFs and 3D-coordination polymers is furthermore strongly
recommended. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0033-4545 1365-3075 1365-3075 |
DOI: | 10.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-20 |