Terminology of metal–organic frameworks and coordination polymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)

A set of terms, definitions, and recommendations is provided for use in the classification of coordination polymers, networks, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). A hierarchical terminology is recommended in which the most general term is coordination polymer. Coordination networks are a subset of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPure and applied chemistry Vol. 85; no. 8; pp. 1715 - 1724
Main Authors Batten, Stuart R., Champness, Neil R., Chen, Xiao-Ming, Garcia-Martinez, Javier, Kitagawa, Susumu, Öhrström, Lars, O’Keeffe, Michael, Paik Suh, Myunghyun, Reedijk, Jan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin De Gruyter 01.01.2013
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A set of terms, definitions, and recommendations is provided for use in the classification of coordination polymers, networks, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). A hierarchical terminology is recommended in which the most general term is coordination polymer. Coordination networks are a subset of coordination polymers and MOFs a further subset of coordination networks. One of the criteria an MOF needs to fulfill is that it contains potential voids, but no physical measurements of porosity or other properties are demanded per se. The use of topology and topology descriptors to enhance the description of crystal structures of MOFs and 3D-coordination polymers is furthermore strongly recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0033-4545
1365-3075
1365-3075
DOI:10.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-20