Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification

The efficiency of two biomass pretreatment technologies, dilute acid hydrolysis and dissolution in an ionic liquid, are compared in terms of delignification, saccharification efficiency and saccharide yields with switchgrass serving as a model bioenergy crop. When subject to ionic liquid pretreatmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 101; no. 13; pp. 4900 - 4906
Main Authors Li, Chenlin, Knierim, Bernhard, Manisseri, Chithra, Arora, Rohit, Scheller, Henrik V., Auer, Manfred, Vogel, Kenneth P., Simmons, Blake A., Singh, Seema
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2010
[New York, NY]: Elsevier Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The efficiency of two biomass pretreatment technologies, dilute acid hydrolysis and dissolution in an ionic liquid, are compared in terms of delignification, saccharification efficiency and saccharide yields with switchgrass serving as a model bioenergy crop. When subject to ionic liquid pretreatment (dissolution and precipitation of cellulose by anti-solvent) switchgrass exhibited reduced cellulose crystallinity, increased surface area, and decreased lignin content compared to dilute acid pretreatment. Pretreated material was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and chemistry methods. Ionic liquid pretreatment enabled a significant enhancement in the rate of enzyme hydrolysis of the cellulose component of switchgrass, with a rate increase of 16.7-fold, and a glucan yield of 96.0% obtained in 24h. These results indicate that ionic liquid pretreatment may offer unique advantages when compared to the dilute acid pretreatment process for switchgrass. However, the cost of the ionic liquid process must also be taken into consideration.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.066
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/45259
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.066