Standard care and telecare services: comparing the effectiveness of two service systems with consumers with intellectual disabilities

Background  Onsite standard care and remote telecare supports were provided to adults with intellectual disabilities living in integrated community settings and evaluated in terms of effectiveness as consumers completed a series of novel household activities. Methods  Using an alternating treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of intellectual disability research Vol. 54; no. 9; pp. 843 - 859
Main Authors Taber-Doughty, T., Shurr, J., Brewer, J., Kubik, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2010
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background  Onsite standard care and remote telecare supports were provided to adults with intellectual disabilities living in integrated community settings and evaluated in terms of effectiveness as consumers completed a series of novel household activities. Methods  Using an alternating treatment design with baseline and follow‐up conditions in this single‐case study, investigators compared the prompting effectiveness provided by onsite standard care staff and a remote telecare provider. Results  While both types of supports resulted in consumers completing tasks, results indicated consumers achieved slightly more independence when prompted by the telecare support provider. Additionally, telecare supports resulted in greater duration for task completion per consumer. Conclusions  Although consumers completed tasks with greater independence using telecare supports, caution should be used when interpreting results due to the small number of participants. The potential for this technology certainly exists in supporting consumers in their own homes thus, suggestions for future investigations are provided.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-5RLX8348-M
ArticleID:JIR1314
istex:4F5EC8C3E6D991A83093A0B8123E4341DA5F9151
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0964-2633
1365-2788
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01314.x