A systematic review of clinically available gene expression profiling assays for stage II colorectal cancer: initial steps toward genetic staging

Abstract Background In recent years, increasingly accessible and novel genetic technologies have spurred keen interest in the application of cancer genetics in predicting prognosis and response to treatment. In particular, investigators have eagerly sought to establish and validate genetic signature...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 212; no. 4; pp. 700 - 714
Main Authors Lopez, Nicole E., M.D, Weiss, Anna C., M.D, Robles, Julie, B.S, Fanta, Paul, M.D, Ramamoorthy, Sonia L., M.D., M.S., F.A.C.S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background In recent years, increasingly accessible and novel genetic technologies have spurred keen interest in the application of cancer genetics in predicting prognosis and response to treatment. In particular, investigators have eagerly sought to establish and validate genetic signatures that might improve the identification of patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) who are at highest risk of recurrence. To better understand the evidence for incorporation of genetic assays into clinical practice, we have systematically reviewed those assays that have been validated and are available for clinical use in stage II CRC. Methods A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The GRADE system was used to evaluate level of evidence and strength of recommendations. Results After duplicates were removed and exclusion criteria were applied, there were 13 articles for review. Conclusion Identifying high-risk patients with stage II CRC using molecular profiling has been the primary aim of many investigators, and the approach is translating into clinical utility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.019