Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of dynamic strategies of asset allocation

This paper makes an extensive simulation comparison of popular dynamic strategies of asset allocation. For each strategy, alternative measures have been calculated for risk, return and risk-adjusted performance (Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, return at risk). Moreover, the strategies are compared in d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic dynamics & control Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 987 - 1011
Main Authors Cesari, Riccardo, Cremonini, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.04.2003
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper makes an extensive simulation comparison of popular dynamic strategies of asset allocation. For each strategy, alternative measures have been calculated for risk, return and risk-adjusted performance (Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, return at risk). Moreover, the strategies are compared in different market situations (bull, bear, no-trend markets) and with different market volatility, taking into account transaction costs and discrete rebalancing of portfolios. The simulations show a dominant role of constant proportion strategies in bear and no-trend markets and a preference for benchmarking strategies in bull markets. These results are independent of the volatility level and the risk-adjusted measure adopted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-1889
1879-1743
DOI:10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00052-0