A new method for quantifying the performance of EEG blind source separation algorithms by referencing a simultaneously recorded ECoG signal

• Published in: Neural Networks Vol. 93; pp. 1 - 6
• Main Authors: Oosugi, Naoya, Kitajo, Keiichi, Hasegawa, Naomi, Nagasaka, Yasuo, Okanoya, Kazuo, Fujii, Naotaka
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Japanese
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2017; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Algorithms; Animals; Artificial Intelligence; Blind source separation; Brain Mapping; Brain Mapping - methods; Cognitive Neuroscience; ECoG; EEG; Electrocorticography; Electrocorticography - methods; Electroencephalography; Electroencephalography - methods; ICA; Macaca fascicularis; Macaca mulatta; Noise; PCA; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Simultaneously recording; Blind source separation; Simultaneously recording; EEG; ECoG; ICA; PCA
• ISSN: 0893-6080; 1879-2782; 1879-2782
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.01.005

Blind source separation (BSS) algorithms extract neural signals from electroencephalography (EEG) data. However, it is difficult to quantify source separation performance because there is no criterion to dissociate neural signals and noise in EEG signals. This study develops a method for evaluating BSS performance. The idea is neural signals in EEG can be estimated by comparison with simultaneously measured electrocorticography (ECoG). Because the ECoG electrodes cover the majority of the lateral cortical surface and should capture most of the original neural sources in the EEG signals. We measured real EEG and ECoG data and developed an algorithm for evaluating BSS performance. First, EEG signals are separated into EEG components using the BSS algorithm. Second, the EEG components are ranked using the correlation coefficients of the ECoG regression and the components are grouped into subsets based on their ranks. Third, canonical correlation analysis estimates how much information is shared between the subsets of the EEG components and the ECoG signals. We used our algorithm to compare the performance of BSS algorithms (PCA, AMUSE, SOBI, JADE, fastICA) via the EEG and ECoG data of anesthetized nonhuman primates. The results (Best case >JADE = fastICA >AMUSE = SOBI ≥ PCA >random separation) were common to the two subjects. To encourage the further development of better BSS algorithms, our EEG and ECoG data are available on our Web site (http://neurotycho.org/) as a common testing platform.