On the importance of the participation margin for labor market fluctuations

Conventional analyses of labor market fluctuations ascribe a minor role to labor force participation. We show, by contrast, that flows-based analyses imply that the participation margin accounts for around one-third of unemployment fluctuations. A novel stock-flow apparatus establishes these facts,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of monetary economics Vol. 72; pp. 64 - 82
Main Authors Elsby, Michael W.L., Hobijn, Bart, Şahin, Ayşegül
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.05.2015
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conventional analyses of labor market fluctuations ascribe a minor role to labor force participation. We show, by contrast, that flows-based analyses imply that the participation margin accounts for around one-third of unemployment fluctuations. A novel stock-flow apparatus establishes these facts, delivering three further contributions. First, the role of the participation margin appears robust to adjustments for spurious transitions induced by reporting error. Second, conventional stocks-based analyses are subject to a stock-flow fallacy, neglecting offsetting forces of worker flows on the participation rate. Third, increases in labor force attachment among the unemployed during recessions are a leading explanation for the role of the participation margin. •Labor force participation flows account for 1/3 of unemployment fluctuations.•Spurious transitions induced by reporting error do not appear to drive the result.•Conventional stocks-based analyses miss the result due to a stock-flow fallacy.•Countercyclical labor force attachment among the unemployed is a key explanation
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0304-3932
1873-1295
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2015.01.004