Computational models for wall shear stress estimation in scaffolds: A comparative study of two complete geometries
Abstract Fluid mechanical stimuli are known to upregulate cell differentiation and matrix formation. Since wall shear stress plays an important role various studies tried to estimate the scaffold fluid dynamic environment. However, because of the geometrical complexity, nearly all studies created th...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of biomechanics Vol. 45; no. 9; pp. 1586 - 1592 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2012
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Fluid mechanical stimuli are known to upregulate cell differentiation and matrix formation. Since wall shear stress plays an important role various studies tried to estimate the scaffold fluid dynamic environment. However, because of the geometrical complexity, nearly all studies created their CFD model based on a submodel of the entire scaffold assuming that the model covers heterogeneity sufficiently. However to the authors’ knowledge no study exist providing guidelines in this matter. In a previous study we demonstrated that submodels are influenced by the boundary conditions, inevitable when flow channels are chopped off. For the current study we therefore developed μCT based models of two complete scaffold geometries (one titanium and one hydroxyapatite). Imposing a 0.04 ml/min flow rate resulted in a surface area averaged wall shear stress of 1.41 mPa for titanium and 1.09 mPa for hydroxyapatite. In order to get insight in required model size we subdivided the domain in regions of different size. From our results we propose a model size between 6 and 10 times the average pore size. The wall shears stress should be calculated on a region at least one pore size away from the boundaries. These guidelines could be of use for computationally more costly simulations where it is not possible to simulate the complete scaffold domain. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.015 |