Exploring women's experiences of care during hospital childbirth in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 290
• Main Authors: Metta, Emmy, Unkels, Regine, Mselle, Lilian Teddy, Hanson, Claudia, Alvesson, Helle Molsted, Al-Beity, Fadhlun M Alwy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 19.04.2024; BMC
• Subjects: Birth companionship; Births; Childbirth; Childbirth & labor; Co-design; Communication; Confidentiality; Data collection; Delivery, Obstetric - psychology; Families & family life; Female; Health facilities; Hospitals; Humans; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal child nursing; Maternal Health Services; Maternal mortality; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Midwifery; Parturition - psychology; Pregnancy; Public health; Qualitative Research; Quality improvement; Respectful care; Rural health services; Tanzania; User needs; Womens health; Women’s experiences; Tanzania; Women’s experiences; Co-design; Quality improvement; Respectful care; Tanzania; Rural health services; Birth companionship; Childbirth
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06396-0

Women's childbirth experiences provide a unique understanding of care received in health facilities from their voices as they describe their needs, what they consider good and what should be changed. Quality Improvement interventions in healthcare are often designed without inputs from women as end-users, leading to a lack of consideration for their needs and expectations. Recently, quality improvement interventions that incorporate women's childbirth experiences are thought to result in healthcare services that are more responsive and grounded in the end-user's needs. This study aimed to explore women's childbirth experiences to inform a co-designed quality improvement intervention in Southern Tanzania. This exploratory qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with women after childbirth (n = 25) in two hospitals in Southern Tanzania. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied using the World Health Organization's Quality of Care framework on experiences of care domains. Three themes emerged from the data: (1) Women's experiences of communication with providers varied (2) Respect and dignity during intrapartum care is not guaranteed; (3) Women had varying experience of support during labour. Verbal mistreatment and threatening language for adverse birthing outcomes were common. Women appreciated physical or emotional support through human interaction. Some women would have wished for more support, but most accepted the current practices as they were. The experiences of care described by women during childbirth varied from one woman to the other. Expectations towards empathic care seemed low, and the little interaction women had during labour and birth was therefore often appreciated and mistreatment normalized. Potential co-designed interventions should include strategies to (i) empower women to voice their needs during childbirth and (ii) support healthcare providers to have competencies to be more responsive to women's needs.