Aggregation and Cooperative Effects in the Aldol Reactions of Lithium Enolates

• Published in: Chemistry : a European journal Vol. 19; no. 41; pp. 13761 - 13773
• Main Authors: Larrañaga, Olatz, de Cózar, Abel, Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias, Zangi, Ronen, Cossío, Fernando P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 04.10.2013; WILEY‐VCH Verlag; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Acetone; Aggregates; Aldehydes; aldol reaction; Chemistry; Clusters; cooperative effects; density functional calculations; Electrostatics; Furniture; Lithium; lithium aggregates; lithium enolates; Molecular dynamics; aldol reaction; density functional calculations; lithium aggregates; lithium enolates; cooperative effects
• ISSN: 0947-6539; 1521-3765
• DOI: 10.1002/chem.201301597

Density functional theory and Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations have been carried out for model aldol reactions involving aggregates of lithium enolates derived from acetaldehyde and acetone. Formaldehyde and acetone have been used as electrophiles. It is found that the geometries of the enolate aggregates are in general determined by the most favorable arrangements of the point charges within the respective LinOn clusters. The reactivity of the enolates follows the sequence monomer≫dimer>tetramer. In lithium aggregates, the initially formed aldol adducts must rearrange to form more stable structures in which the enolate and alkoxide oxygen atoms are within the respective LinOn clusters. Positive cooperative effects, similar to allosteric effects found in several proteins, are found for the successive aldol reactions in aggregates. The corresponding transition structures show in general sofa geometries. Not free‐of‐charge! Electrostatics is the most important factor that determines the geometry and reactivity of lithium enolate aggregates in aldol reactions. It is found that the reactivity order is monomer≫dimer>tetramer. Positive cooperative effects are found in the aldol reaction of dimers and tetramers. “Sofa” geometries are found to be the best compromise between electrostatics and 1,4‐diaxial interactions (see figure).