Using virtual reality to investigate comparative spatial cognitive abilities in chimpanzees and humans

The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of investigating spatial cognitive abilities across two primate species using virtual reality. In this study, we presented four captive adult chimpanzees and 16 humans (12 children and 4 adults) with simulated environments of increasing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of primatology Vol. 76; no. 5; pp. 496 - 513
Main Authors Dolins, Francine L., Klimowicz, Christopher, Kelley, John, Menzel, Charles R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of investigating spatial cognitive abilities across two primate species using virtual reality. In this study, we presented four captive adult chimpanzees and 16 humans (12 children and 4 adults) with simulated environments of increasing complexity and size to compare species' attention to visuo‐spatial features during navigation. The specific task required participants to attend to landmarks in navigating along routes in order to localize the goal site. Both species were found to discriminate effectively between positive and negative landmarks. Assessing path efficiency revealed that both species and all age groups used relatively efficient, distance reducing routes during navigation. Compared to the chimpanzees and adult humans however, younger children's performance decreased as maze complexity and size increased. Surprisingly, in the most complex maze category the humans' performance was less accurate compared to one female chimpanzee. These results suggest that the method of using virtual reality to test captive primates, and in particular, chimpanzees, affords significant cross‐species investigations of spatial cognitive and developmental comparisons. Am. J. Primatol. 76:496–513, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-Z0K6TLW2-N
Leakey Foundation
NIH - No. HD-056352; No. HD-38051; No. HD-060563
ArticleID:AJP22252
istex:9B9D55015E7D9A4D45A60B2EEB1F268384B248D8
Brooklyn Polytechnic of New York University
University of Winchester
The University of Michigan-Dearborn
The Wenner-Gren Foundation
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0275-2565
1098-2345
DOI:10.1002/ajp.22252