Investigation of change in cardinal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgical or ongoing medical management

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been defined as inflammation of the paranasal sinuses lasting at least 12 weeks with corresponding 2 or more “cardinal symptoms” that include: (1) nasal obstruction; (2) thick nasal discharge; (3) facial pain/pressure; and (4) reduction or loss of sense of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational forum of allergy & rhinology Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 36 - 45
Main Authors DeConde, Adam S., Mace, Jess C., Alt, Jeremiah A., Soler, Zachary M., Orlandi, Richard R., Smith, Timothy L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been defined as inflammation of the paranasal sinuses lasting at least 12 weeks with corresponding 2 or more “cardinal symptoms” that include: (1) nasal obstruction; (2) thick nasal discharge; (3) facial pain/pressure; and (4) reduction or loss of sense of smell. Although prior studies have investigated symptoms of CRS after sinus surgery, none have compared the outcomes of these specific symptoms to ongoing medical therapy. Methods Patients with CRS were prospectively enrolled into a multi‐institutional, comparative effectiveness, cohort study. Subjects elected either continued medical management or endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Baseline characteristics and objective clinical findings were collected. Cardinal symptoms of CRS were operationalized by 4 questions on the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22). Symptom improvement was evaluated in subjects with at least 6‐month follow‐up. Results A total of 342 subjects were enrolled, with 69 (20.2%) electing continued medical management, whereas 273 (79.8%) elected ESS. Subjects electing surgical therapy were more likely to have a higher baseline aggregate SNOT‐22 score (44.3 (18.9) vs 53.6 (18.8); p < 0.001). All subjects improved across all cardinal symptoms; however, subjects undergoing ESS were significantly more likely (p ≤ 0.013) to experience improvement in thick nasal discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 4.36), facial pain/pressure (OR = 3.56), and blockage/congestion of nose (OR = 2.76). Subjects with nasal polyposis were significantly more likely to report complete resolution of smell/taste following ESS compare to medical management (23.8% vs 4.0%; p = 0.026). Conclusion Across a large population, surgical management is more effective at resolving the cardinal symptoms of CRS than ongoing medical management with the exception of sense of smell/taste.
Bibliography:National Institutes of Health
ArticleID:ALR21410
ark:/67375/WNG-Q37ZJM8M-7
istex:B869BB83306944CDEAAE3E3BB4E67C321678803A
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders - No. R01 DC005805
Potential conflict of interest: T.L.S., J.C.M., and Z.M.S. are supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [NIDCD] R01 DC005805 to T.L.S.). T.L.S. is also a consultant for IntersectENT, Inc (Menlo Park, CA), which is not affiliated with this investigation. R.R.O. is a consultant for Medtronic ENT (Jacksonville, FL), which is not affiliated with this research.
Funding sources for the study: National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [NIDCD] R01 DC005805 to T.L.S.)
Determinants of Medical and Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Sinusitis.
Public clinical trial registration
Submitted for oral presentation to the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) at the Annual American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO‐HNS) meeting on September 20, 2014, Orlando, FL (Abstract submission #718).
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01332136
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.21410