Uricosuric Action of Losartan via the Inhibition of Urate Transporter 1 (URAT 1) in Hypertensive Patients

Background The angiotensin receptor blocker losartan inhibited urate transporter 1 (URAT1) according to in vitro experiments. However, it is still unknown whether the inhibitory effect of losartan on URAT1 contributes to its uricosuric action in humans. Methods Thirty-two patients with hypertension...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of hypertension Vol. 21; no. 10; pp. 1157 - 1162
Main Authors Hamada, Toshihiro, Ichida, Kimiyoshi, Hosoyamada, Makoto, Mizuta, Einosuke, Yanagihara, Kiyotaka, Sonoyama, Kazuhiko, Sugihara, Shinobu, Igawa, Osamu, Hosoya, Tatsuo, Ohtahara, Akira, Shigamasa, Chiaki, Yamamoto, Yasutaka, Ninomiya, Haruaki, Hisatome, Ichiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Oxford University Press 01.10.2008
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The angiotensin receptor blocker losartan inhibited urate transporter 1 (URAT1) according to in vitro experiments. However, it is still unknown whether the inhibitory effect of losartan on URAT1 contributes to its uricosuric action in humans. Methods Thirty-two patients with hypertension and nine patients with idiopathic renal hypouricemia (five with and four without hypertension) were enrolled for this study. Hypertensive patients were prescribed oral losartan (50 mg/day, n = 16) or candesartan (8 mg/day, n = 16). Before and after 1-month treatment, the serum concentration of urate (Sur) and creatinine (Scr), and the clearance value of urate (Cur) and creatinine (Ccr) were determined. Clearance studies using the URAT1 inhibitor benzbromarone (100 mg/day) or losartan (50 mg/day) loading test were also performed in these patients. Results Blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased in the patients treated with either losartan or candesartan. Losartan significantly reduced Sur, which was associated with a concomitant increase in the Cur/Ccr ratio, whereas candesartan did not alter these parameters. In hypertensive patients with loss-of-function mutation of URAT1, losartan did not alter either Sur or Cur/Ccr, nor did benzbromarone. The lack of effect of URAT1 inhibitors on renal excretion of urate was independent of the renal function of hypouricemic patients. On the other hand, both losartan and benzbromarone increased Cur/Ccr ratio in hypertensive patients harboring the wild URAT1 gene, regardless of the presence of hypouricemia. Conclusions These findings suggested that losartan inhibited URAT1 and thereby it lowered Sur levels in hypertensive patients.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-SBBS4893-C
href:21_10_1157.pdf
istex:7727C4B376EA8FB2F7B7DC6F833337698DEECB1D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
DOI:10.1038/ajh.2008.245