Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial

• Published in: World journal of surgical oncology Vol. 21; no. 1; p. 167
• Main Authors: Lv, Xin, Ding, Bo, Xu, JingYun, Shen, Yang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03.06.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abdomen; Blood transfusion; Body mass index; Cancer; Care and treatment; Cervical cancer; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Complications; Cytology; Demographic aspects; Disease-Free Survival; Dissection; Early-stage cervical cancer; Endocutter; Endoscopy; Feasibility studies; Female; General anesthesia; Health aspects; Histopathology; Humans; Hysterectomy; Hysterectomy - adverse effects; Laparoscopic surgery; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Lymph nodes; Lymphatic system; Medical instruments; Medical prognosis; Neoplasm Staging; Open surgery; Patient outcomes; Patients; Postoperative; Prospective Studies; Radical hysterectomy; Retrospective Studies; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery; Vagina; Women; China; Endocutter; Laparoscopic surgery; Radical hysterectomy; Early-stage cervical cancer; Open surgery
• ISSN: 1477-7819; 1477-7819
• DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03044-3

The long-term prognosis of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for early cervical cancer is controversial. This study mainly discusses the feasibility and effectiveness of the endocutter in radical laparoscopic hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy on patients with FIGO stage IA1 (lymphovascular invasion), IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer, between January 2020 and July 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH) groups. The ORH group used right-angle sealing forceps for vaginal stump closure, whereas the LRH group used endoscopic staplers. The primary outcomes included the evaluation of the patient's perioperative indicators, as well as short- and long-term complications. Recurrence and overall survival were considered secondary outcomes. As of July 2021, 17 patients were enrolled in the laparoscopic surgery group and 17 in the open surgery group. The hospitalization time of the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than those of the open group (15 min vs. 9 min, P < 0.001). The vaginal stump closure time in the laparoscopic group was longer than that in the open surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Post-operative catheter removal (P = 0.72), drainage tube removal time (P = 0.27), number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.72), and incidence of intraoperative and post-operative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median blood loss in the laparoscopic group was 278 ml, and it was 350 ml in the laparotomy group. The intraoperative blood transfusion rate was lower in the laparoscopic group; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.175). Vaginal margin pathology and peritoneal lavage cytology were negative, and all the patient's vaginal stumps healed without infection. The median follow-up time of the laparoscopic group was 20.5 months, and it was 22 months for the open surgery group. There was no recurrence in all patients during the follow-up period. Modified LRH with endocutter closure of the vaginal stump is an effective approach and not inferior to ORH in treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer. ChiCTR2000030160, date of registration February 26, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=49809 ).