The anatomy of safe surgical teams: an interview-based qualitative study among members of surgical teams at tertiary referral hospitals in Norway

• Published in: Patient safety in surgery Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 7
• Main Authors: Vikan, Magnhild, Deilkås, Ellen Ct, Valeberg, Berit T, Bjørnnes, Ann K, Husby, Vigdis S, Haugen, Arvid S, Danielsen, Stein O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.02.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accountability; Adverse events; Care and treatment; Catalysts; Check lists; Collaboration; Context; Culture; Empirical analysis; Health care delivery; Hospitals; Interviews; Learning; Media richness; Medical errors; Medical personnel; Nurses; Orthopedics; Patient safety; Patient safety culture; Patients; Personal health; Physicians; Professionals; Qualitative research; Quality control; Quality improvement; Questionnaires; Reflexivity; Risk perception; Safety; Surgery; Teams; Workloads; Norway; Patient safety; Quality improvement; Medical errors; Adverse events; Patient safety culture; Surgery
• ISSN: 1754-9493; 1754-9493
• DOI: 10.1186/s13037-024-00389-w

In spite of the global implementation of surgical safety checklists to improve patient safety, patients undergoing surgical procedures remain vulnerable to a high risk of potentially preventable complications and adverse outcomes. The present study was designed to explore the surgical teams' perceptions of patient safety culture, capture their perceptions of the risk for adverse events, and identify themes of interest for quality improvement within the surgical department. This qualitative study had an explorative design with an abductive approach. Individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted between 10/01/23 and 11/05/23. The participants were members of surgical teams (n = 17), general and orthopedic surgeons (n = 5), anesthesiologists (n = 4), nurse anesthetists (n = 4) and operating room nurses (n = 4). Middle managers recruited purposively from general and orthopedic surgical teams in two tertiary hospitals in Norway, aiming for a maximum variation due to gender, age, and years within the specialty. The data material was analyzed following Braun and Clarke's method for reflexive thematic analysis to generate patterns of meaning and develop themes and subthemes. The analysis process resulted in three themes describing the participants' perceptions of patient safety culture in the surgical context: (1) individual accountability as a safety net, (2) psychological safety as a catalyst for well-being and safe performance in the operating room, and (3) the importance of proactive structures and participation in organizational learning. This study provided an empirical insight into the culture of patient safety in the surgical context. The study highlighted the importance of supporting the individuals' competence, building psychological safety in the surgical team, and creating structures and culture promoting a learning organization. Quality improvement projects, including interventions based on these results, may increase patient safety culture and reduce the frequency of adverse events in the surgical context.