Excited-state proton transfer relieves antiaromaticity in molecules

Baird’s rule explains why and when excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) reactions happen in organic compounds. Bifunctional compounds that are [4n + 2] π-aromatic in the ground state, become [4n + 2] π-antiaromatic in the first ¹ππ* states, and proton transfer (either inter- or intramolecularly) hel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 41; pp. 20303 - 20308
Main Authors Wu, Chia-Hua, Karas, Lucas José, Ottosson, Henrik, Wu, Judy I-Chia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 08.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Baird’s rule explains why and when excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) reactions happen in organic compounds. Bifunctional compounds that are [4n + 2] π-aromatic in the ground state, become [4n + 2] π-antiaromatic in the first ¹ππ* states, and proton transfer (either inter- or intramolecularly) helps relieve excited-state antiaromaticity. Computed nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) for several ESPT examples (including excited-state intramolecular proton transfers (ESIPT), biprotonic transfers, dynamic catalyzed transfers, and proton relay transfers) document the important role of excited-state antiaromaticity. o-Salicylic acid undergoes ESPT only in the “antiaromatic” S₁ (¹ππ*) state, but not in the “aromatic” S₂ (¹ππ*) state. Stokes’ shifts of structurally related compounds [e.g., derivatives of 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole and hydrogen-bonded complexes of 2-aminopyridine with protic substrates] vary depending on the antiaromaticity of the photoinduced tautomers. Remarkably, Baird’s rule predicts the effect of light on hydrogen bond strengths; hydrogen bonds that enhance (and reduce) excited-state antiaromaticity in compounds become weakened (and strengthened) upon photoexcitation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: C.-H.W. and J.I.W. designed research; C.-H.W. and L.J.K. performed research; C.-H.W., L.J.K., H.O., and J.I.W. analyzed data and made intellectual contributions to the development of the paper; and J.I.W. wrote the paper.
Edited by Kendall N. Houk, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, and approved August 28, 2019 (received for review May 20, 2019)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1908516116