Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T

A challenge in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is the accurate assessment of aggressiveness. To validate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate at 3 tesla (T) for the assessment of PCa aggressiveness, with prostatectomy specimens as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean urology Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 448 - 455
Main Authors Vos, Eline K., Litjens, Geert J.S., Kobus, Thiele, Hambrock, Thomas, Kaa, Christina A. Hulsbergen-van de, Barentsz, Jelle O., Huisman, Henkjan J., Scheenen, Tom W.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.09.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A challenge in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is the accurate assessment of aggressiveness. To validate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate at 3 tesla (T) for the assessment of PCa aggressiveness, with prostatectomy specimens as the reference standard. A total of 45 patients with PCa scheduled for prostatectomy were included. This study was approved by the institutional review board; the need for informed consent was waived. Subjects underwent a clinical MRI protocol including DCE-MRI. Blinded to DCE-images, PCa was indicated on T2-weighted images based on histopathology results from prostatectomy specimens with the use of anatomical landmarks for the precise localization of the tumor. PCa was classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-grade, according to Gleason score. DCE-images were used as an overlay on T2-weighted images; mean and quartile values from semi-quantitative and pharmacokinetic model parameters were extracted per tumor region. Statistical analysis included Spearman's ρ, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Significant differences were seen for the mean and 75th percentile (p75) values of wash-in (p = 0.024 and p = 0.017, respectively), mean wash-out (p = 0.044), and p75 of transfer constant (Ktrans) (p = 0.035), all between low-grade and high-grade PCa in the peripheral zone. ROC analysis revealed the best discriminating performance between low-grade versus intermediate-grade plus high-grade PCa in the peripheral zone for p75 of wash-in, Ktrans, and rate constant (Kep) (area under the curve: 0.72). Due to a limited number of tumors in the transition zone, a definitive conclusion for this region of the prostate could not be drawn. Quantitative parameters (Ktrans and Kep) and semi-quantitative parameters (wash-in and wash-out) derived from DCE-MRI at 3 T have the potential to assess the aggressiveness of PCa in the peripheral zone. P75 of wash-in, Ktrans, and Kep offer the best possibility to discriminate low-grade from intermediate-grade plus high-grade PCa. Quantitative (transfer constant and rate constant) and semi-quantitative (wash-in and wash-out) parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging have the potential to assess prostate cancer aggressiveness in the peripheral zone. These results are promising for selecting patients for active surveillance and thus preventing overtreatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.045