Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Temporally Distinct Resting‐State Functional Connectivity Networks

Summary Introduction Resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R‐fMRI) is dynamic in nature as neural activities constantly change over the time and are dominated by repeating brief activations and deactivations involving many brain regions. Each region participates in multiple brain func...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCNS neuroscience & therapeutics Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 212 - 219
Main Authors Wee, Chong‐Yaw, Yap, Pew‐Thian, Shen, Dinggang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2016
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Introduction Resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R‐fMRI) is dynamic in nature as neural activities constantly change over the time and are dominated by repeating brief activations and deactivations involving many brain regions. Each region participates in multiple brain functions and is part of various functionally distinct but spatially overlapping networks. Functional connectivity computed as correlations over the entire time series always overlooks interregion interactions that often occur repeatedly and dynamically in time, limiting its application to disease diagnosis. Aims We develop a novel framework that uses short‐time activation patterns of brain connectivity to better detect subtle disease‐induced disruptions of brain connectivity. A clustering algorithm is first used to temporally decompose R‐fMRI time series into distinct clusters with similar spatial distribution of neural activity based on the assumption that functionally distinct networks should be largely temporally distinct as brain states do not simultaneously coexist in general. A Pearson correlation‐based functional connectivity network is then constructed for each cluster to allow for better exploration of spatiotemporal dynamics of individual neural activity. To reduce significant intersubject variability and to remove possible spurious connections, we use a group‐constrained sparse regression model to construct a backbone sparse network for each cluster and use it to weight the corresponding Pearson correlation network. Results The proposed method outperforms the conventional static, temporally dependent fully connected correlation‐based networks by at least 7% on a publicly available autism dataset. We were able to reproduce similar results using data from other centers. Conclusions By combining the advantages of temporal independence and group‐constrained sparse regression, our method improves autism diagnosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1755-5930
1755-5949
DOI:10.1111/cns.12499