Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV): the 4-year review of the real-life treatment experiences

The purpose of this article was to study the real-life treatment results of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). This was a retrospective study. Patients with presumed age-related macular degeneration were reviewed, and PCV diagnosis was made using the EVEREST study criteria. Outcomes were chang...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Vol. 12; pp. 2177 - 2181
Main Authors Ratanasukon, Mansing, Bhurayanontachai, Patama, Jirarattanasopa, Pichai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this article was to study the real-life treatment results of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). This was a retrospective study. Patients with presumed age-related macular degeneration were reviewed, and PCV diagnosis was made using the EVEREST study criteria. Outcomes were changes in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness, time between treatments, follow-up time, and number of treatments. The prevalence of PCV was 30.8%. At the beginning, 195 eyes received monotherapy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, either bevacizumab or ranibizumab, and only six eyes received the combination of anti-VEGF injection and photodynamic therapy (PDT) at the time of the first treatment. During the follow-up, some patients received "rescue or add-on" PDT when they had a poor response after anti-VEGF injections. After 4 years, the average number of injections was 8.25 and 9.15 for the anti-VEGF monotherapy and the combination groups, respectively. The average time between the first anti-VEGF injections and the first PDT was 21.4 months. The average VA in the anti-VEGF monotherapy group increased by 1.5 letters, whereas it decreased by 0.95 letters in the combination group ( =0.48). The review demonstrated the same visual outcomes between the combination therapy of anti-VEGF injections and rescue or add-on PDT vs monotherapy anti-VEGF injections in PCV treatment. When compared with EVEREST II and Planet studies, the "initial" or "rescue or add-on PDT" might have different effects on the final visual outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1177-5467
1177-5483
1177-5483
DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S178228