Isolated iliac artery aneurysms: A contemporary comparison of endovascular and open repair

Objective Iliac artery aneurysms are rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality when ruptured. This study compares recent open and endovascular repairs of iliac aneurysms at a single institution. Methods Patients were identified and charts reviewed using ICD-9 and CPT codes for ili...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vascular surgery Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 708 - 713.e1
Main Authors Chaer, Rabih A., MD, Barbato, Joel E., MD, Lin, Stephanie C., MD, Zenati, Mazen, MD, MPH, PhD, Kent, K. Craig, MD, McKinsey, James F., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.04.2008
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Iliac artery aneurysms are rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality when ruptured. This study compares recent open and endovascular repairs of iliac aneurysms at a single institution. Methods Patients were identified and charts reviewed using ICD-9 and CPT codes for iliac artery aneurysm and open or endovascular repair performed between January 2000 and January 2006. Baseline characteristics, procedure-related variables, and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 71 patients were treated with isolated iliac artery aneurysms. There were 19 open and 52 endovascular repairs. Seven presented with acute ruptures and were treated by open (4) or endovascular (3) repair. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Major perioperative (30 day) complications included three deaths in the open group from cardiovascular complications, all after ruptured aneurysm repair, and one death in the endovascular group (after rupture; one additional perioperative death occurred after 30 days due to colonic infarction) ( P = NS). Postoperative complications were less frequent in the endovascular group, although this did not reach statistical significance. The mortality was 50% in the open group and 33% in the endovascular group for patients presenting with a ruptured aneurysm ( P = NS). Transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the open group (47%) than in the endovascular group (6%) ( P = .03). The mean follow-up was 20 ± 5 months in the open group and 17 ± 2 months in the endovascular group ( P = NS). Long-term complications included two limb thromboses following repair with a bifurcated stent graft that were treated with thrombolysis plus stenting or a fem-fem bypass. Three endoleaks were identified on postop CT scans, all of which were successfully managed with endovascular techniques. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm-related death. The mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 ± 2.3 days (open) and 1.3 ± 1.0 days (endovascular) ( P = .04). Conclusions This is the first large, case control study comparing open vs endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Endovascular repair of iliac artery aneurysms is safe and results in decreased length of stay, lower requirement for perioperative blood transfusion, and similar intermediate term outcomes as open repair.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0741-5214
1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.008