A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice
This paper seeks to review and to contrast the main streams of thought in Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) theory and practice, without attempting to review all MCDM methods in detail. The main purpose is to identify pitfalls in the usage of various approaches, and to suggest approaches whic...
Saved in:
Published in | Omega (Oxford) Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 569 - 586 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, Eng
Elsevier Ltd
01.09.1992
Elsevier Pergamon Press Pergamon Press Inc |
Series | Omega |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper seeks to review and to contrast the main streams of thought in Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) theory and practice, without attempting to review all MCDM methods in detail. The main purpose is to identify pitfalls in the usage of various approaches, and to suggest approaches which are most robustly and effectively useable, especially by the non-expert in MCDM methodology. Problem areas in MCDM still requiring further research are also discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-0483 1873-5274 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0305-0483(92)90003-P |