Increased Proximal Arterial Stiffness and Cardiac Response With Moderate Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Objectives This study sought to demonstrate that arterial stiffness is probably underestimated in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at rest and may be revealed with moderate exercise. Background HFpEF is associated with ventriculoarterial stiffening. Methods We com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 455 - 461
Main Authors Tartière-Kesri, Lamia, MD, Tartière, Jean-Michel, MD, Logeart, Damien, MD, PhD, Beauvais, Florence, MD, Cohen Solal, Alain, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 31.01.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
PP
YEM
E
LV
Ep
PVR
EDP
EDV
SV
PWV
Ees
E/E
Ea
HF
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives This study sought to demonstrate that arterial stiffness is probably underestimated in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at rest and may be revealed with moderate exercise. Background HFpEF is associated with ventriculoarterial stiffening. Methods We compared 23 patients with stable chronic HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction >45%, and impaired relaxation with 15 controls without cardiac disease. Patients were compared at rest and during a 30-W exercise. The following variables were measured or calculated by Doppler echocardiography and tonometry: left ventricular volumes and end-systolic elastance (Ees), peripheral resistance, arterial elastance (Ea), arterial compliance, aortic pulse wave velocity, and carotid Peterson modulus (Ep). Results Patients with HFpEF were comparable to controls in age, sex ratio, blood pressure, and heart rate. Ventriculoarterial coupling, assessed by Ees/Ea and Ees/Ep ratios, was moderately impaired at rest in patients compared with controls (both p < 0.01). HFpEF was associated during exercise with a major increase in Ep (+155 ± 193% vs. −5 ± 28%), pulse wave velocity (+20 ± 30% vs. −7 ± 24%), and Ea (+12 ± 15% vs. −5 ± 10%), and a lower decrease in peripheral resistance (−17 ± 12% vs. −26 ± 12%) (p < 0.05 for all). In addition, HFpEF patients showed a lower increase in stroke volume (+10 ± 16% vs. +21 ± 12%) despite a greater increase in Ees (+20 ± 18% vs. +3 ± 12%) (p < 0.05 for all). Also during exercise, adaptation of proximal ventriculoarterial coupling was impaired in HFpEF patients (Ees/Ep: −26 ± 47% vs. +20 ± 47% for controls) (p < 0.01), with no difference in Ees/Ea. Conclusions In HFpEF patients, moderate exercise leads to a steep increase in proximal afterload that is underestimated at rest and is associated with unfavorable ventriculoarterial coupling and exercise intolerance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.873