A novel tapered guide extension catheter facilitated successful completion of complex percutaneous coronary intervention

• Published in: European journal of medical research Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 101
• Main Authors: Liao, Jianquan, Wu, Runda, Ma, Yuanji, Zhang, Meng, Chen, Yaolin, Yao, Kang, Ge, Junbo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 25.02.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Angioplasty; Backup support; Blood clots; Cardiology; Catheters; Coronary vessels; Guide extension catheter; Hypotension; Intervention; Intubation; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Statistical analysis; Stents; Success; Transluminal angioplasty; Veins & arteries; United States > US; Guide extension catheter; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Backup support
• ISSN: 2047-783X; 0949-2321; 2047-783X
• DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01067-w

Guide extension catheters (GEC) are widely applied to cope with insufficient backup support in complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety with a novel 5-4F tapered GEC used in complex lesion. The single-center retrospective study enrolled a total of 615 patients, in whom the 5F or 5-4F Expressman GEC was used to facilitate PCI procedure. Demographic and procedural data were collected. 5F GEC was used in 295 patients and 5-4F tapered GEC in 320 patients. The average age was 63.6 ± 11.0 years and 81.6% of the patients were male. Severe calcification and chronic total occlusion (CTO) were the commonest indication for the GEC use. The 5-4F tapered GEC was frequently used in active greeting technique (AGT) during CTO intervention procedure than 5F GEC (6.1% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001). The average depth of intubation was 41.5 ± 19.6 mm for the 5-4F tapered GEC and 24.4 ± 15.1 mm for 5F GEC (p < 0.001). The rate of successful device delivery with 5-4F GEC was higher than 5F GEC (95.6% vs. 98.4%, p = 0.037). Pressure damping with 5F GEC occurred frequently than 5-4F GEC (7.4% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.05). Similarly, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in 5F GEC than 5-4F GEC (4.7% vs.1.9%, p < 0.05). The novel 5-4F tapered GEC was superior to the 5F GEC in facilitating successful completion of PCI in the majority of patients with complex lesions via transradial approach.