Variations in body weight, food intake and body composition after long‐term high‐fat diet feeding in C57BL/6J mice

Objective To investigate the variations in body weight, food intake, and body composition of both male and female C57BL/6J mice during a diet‐induced obesity model with high‐fat diet (HFD) feeding. Methods Mice were individually housed and fed ad libitum either a low‐fat diet (LFD, 10% calories from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inObesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Vol. 22; no. 10; pp. 2147 - 2155
Main Authors Yang, Yongbin, Smith, Daniel L., Keating, Karen D., Allison, David B., Nagy, Tim R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To investigate the variations in body weight, food intake, and body composition of both male and female C57BL/6J mice during a diet‐induced obesity model with high‐fat diet (HFD) feeding. Methods Mice were individually housed and fed ad libitum either a low‐fat diet (LFD, 10% calories from fat; n = 15 male, n = 15 female) or HFD (45% calories from fat; n = 277 male, n = 278 female) from 8 to 43 weeks of age. Body weight, food intake, and body composition were routinely measured. Results Body weight was significantly increased with HFD (vs. LFD) in males from week 14 (P = 0.0221) and in females from week 27 (P = 0.0076). Fat mass and fat‐free mass of all groups were significantly increased over time (all P < 0.0001), with a large variation observed in fat mass. Baseline fat mass, fat‐free mass, and daily energy intake were significant predictors of future body weight for both sexes (P < 0.0001). Baseline fat mass was a significant predictor of future body fat (P < 0.0001). Conclusions Both males and females have large variations in fat mass, and this variability increases over time, while that of fat‐free mass remains relatively stable. Sex differences exist in HFD responses and multivariate predicting models of body weight.
Bibliography:This study was supported in part by NIH grants R01AG033682, P30DK056336, P60DK079626 and T32DK062710.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIH or any other organization with which the authors are affiliated. DBA has received book royalties, grants, consulting fees, and donations from multiple profit and nonprofit entities with interests in obesity. TRN has received grants and consulting fees from for‐profit entities with interests in obesity and owns common stock in other for‐profit entities with interests in obesity.
DLS, DBA, and TRN conceived the study and provided critical support on statistical analyses and data interpretation. YY and DLS helped data collection. YY and KDK performed statistical analyses. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.
Disclosure
Funding agencies
Author contributions
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1930-7381
1930-739X
DOI:10.1002/oby.20811