Does method of sternal repair influence long-term outcome of postoperative mediastinitis?
Abstract Background Post-sternotomy mediastinitis reduces survival after cardiac surgery, potentially further affected by details of mediastinal vascularized flap reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival after different methods for sternal reconstruction in mediastinitis. Metho...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of surgery Vol. 202; no. 5; pp. 565 - 567 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2011
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Background Post-sternotomy mediastinitis reduces survival after cardiac surgery, potentially further affected by details of mediastinal vascularized flap reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival after different methods for sternal reconstruction in mediastinitis. Methods Two hundred twenty-two adult cardiac surgery patients with post-sternotomy mediastinitis were reviewed. After controlling infection, often augmented by negative pressure therapy, muscle flap, omental flap, or secondary closure was performed. Outcomes were reviewed and survival analysis was performed. Results Baseline characteristics were similar. In-hospital mortality (15.7%) did not differ between groups. Secondary closure was correlated with negative pressure therapy and reduced length hospital of stay. Recurrent wound complications were more common with muscle flap repair. Survival was unaffected by sternal repair technique. By multivariate analysis, heart failure, sepsis, age, and vascular disease independently predicted mortality, while negative pressure therapy was associated with survival. Conclusions Choice of sternal repair was unrelated to survival, but mediastinal treatment with negative pressure therapy promotes favorable early and late outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.013 |