Selective Inhibition of DNA Polymerase ε by Phosphatidylinositol

We studied the effects of various phoapholipids on the DNA synthesizing reactions by calf thymus DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε. Of these three enzymes, DNA polymerase ε was most sensitive to acidic phospholipids, i.e., phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate (PIP), phosphatidyl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biochemistry (Tokyo) Vol. 117; no. 5; pp. 1095 - 1099
Main Authors Shoji-Kawaguchi, Mami, Izuta, Shunji, Tamiya-Koizumi, Keiko, Suzuki, Motoshi, Yoshida, Shonen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.05.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We studied the effects of various phoapholipids on the DNA synthesizing reactions by calf thymus DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε. Of these three enzymes, DNA polymerase ε was most sensitive to acidic phospholipids, i.e., phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate (PIP), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidic acid (PA), and cardiolipin (CAR). Of these acidic phospholipids, PI (from bovine liver) is of special interest because it inhibited DNA polymerase ε much more strongly than DNA polymerase α and δ. The inhibition of DNA polymerase ε by PI was competitive with the DNA template-primer and was noncompetitive with dTTP substrate. The K1 value was estimated to be 16 μM. These results indicate that PI from bovine liver can be used as a specific inhibitor for DNA polymerase ε to analyze its role in DNA replication. Interestingly, the PI isolated from soybean, which has a different fatty acid composition, inhibited not only DNA polymerase ε but also DNA polymerase α.
Bibliography:1To whom correspondence should be addressed
ArticleID:117.5.1095
istex:8C866B427CB9B47F355A3A2A7BC4BAC0ABE790AE
ark:/67375/HXZ-P8G6H2NF-V
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-924X
1756-2651
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124812