Mechanical constraint from growing jaw facilitates mammalian dental diversity

Much of the basic information about individual organ development comes from studies using model species. Whereas conservation of gene regulatory networks across higher taxa supports generalizations made from a limited number of species, generality of mechanistic inferences remains to be tested in ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 114; no. 35; pp. 9403 - 9408
Main Authors Renvoisé, Elodie, Kavanagh, Kathryn D., Lazzari, Vincent, Häkkinen, Teemu J., Rice, Ritva, Pantalacci, Sophie, Salazar-Ciudad, Isaac, Jernvall, Jukka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 29.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Much of the basic information about individual organ development comes from studies using model species. Whereas conservation of gene regulatory networks across higher taxa supports generalizations made from a limited number of species, generality of mechanistic inferences remains to be tested in tissue culture systems. Here, using mammalian tooth explants cultured in isolation, we investigate self-regulation of patterning by comparing developing molars of the mouse, the model species of mammalian research, and the bank vole. A distinct patterning difference between the vole and the mouse molars is the alternate cusp offset present in the vole. Analyses of both species using 3D reconstructions of developing molars and jaws, computational modeling of cusp patterning, and tooth explants cultured with small braces show that correct cusp offset requires constraints on the lateral expansion of the developing tooth. Vole molars cultured without the braces lose their cusp offset, and mouse molars cultured with the braces develop a cusp offset. Our results suggest that cusp offset, which changes frequently in mammalian evolution, is more dependent on the 3D support of the developing jaw than other aspects of tooth shape. This jaw–tooth integration of a specific aspect of the tooth phenotype indicates that organs may outsource specific aspects of their morphology to be regulated by adjacent body parts or organs. Comparative studies of morphologically different species are needed to infer the principles of organogenesis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5584446
Edited by Neil H. Shubin, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved July 17, 2017 (received for review May 9, 2017)
Author contributions: E.R., K.D.K., and J.J. designed research; E.R., K.D.K., V.L., T.J.H., R.R., S.P., I.S.-C., and J.J. performed research; V.L., T.J.H., R.R., S.P., and I.S.-C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.R., K.D.K., V.L., and J.J. analyzed data; and E.R., K.D.K., and J.J. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1707410114