Pretherapeutic uracil and dihydrouracil levels in saliva of colorectal cancer patients are associated with toxicity during adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

Purpose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) competes with uracil (Ura) as a substrate for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Low DPD activity impairs breakdown of Ura to dihydrouracil (UH 2 ) and is associated with toxicity during 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Calculation of the 5-FU dose is based on body surface...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology Vol. 74; no. 4; pp. 757 - 763
Main Authors Carlsson, Göran, Odin, Elisabeth, Gustavsson, Bengt, Wettergren, Yvonne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2014
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
)
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) competes with uracil (Ura) as a substrate for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Low DPD activity impairs breakdown of Ura to dihydrouracil (UH 2 ) and is associated with toxicity during 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Calculation of the 5-FU dose is based on body surface area, and new tools are needed to individualize treatment. The aim of study was to measure Ura and UH 2 in saliva of patients with colorectal cancer and relate levels to treatment-induced toxicity. Methods Saliva was collected from 73 patients with stage III colorectal cancer prior to adjuvant 5-FU-based treatment. Ura and UH 2 were analyzed by a column-switching HPLC method. Toxicity was evaluated before each treatment cycle and the highest grade was noted at end of treatment. Results Toxicity was more common and severe among women compared with men. The Ura and UH 2 concentrations in saliva were 5.0 ± 6.8 and 5.0 ± 4.0 nmol/ml, respectively. The UH 2 /Ura ratio was lower in women compared with men (1.2 ± 1.0 and 2.2 ± 2.5, respectively, p  = 0.0026). Patients who needed to reduce the drug dose during treatment (or terminate treatment) due to toxicity had a lower ratio (1.3 ± 0.85) compared to patients who completed treatment without dose reduction (4.1 ± 4.3, p  < 0.0001). Conclusion Sampling of saliva is a quick, noninvasive, safe and painless process that gives information about patients Ura and UH 2 levels prior to chemotherapeutical treatment. This information may be useful in order to predict and prevent occurrence of treatment-related toxicities which otherwise may limit drug administration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-014-2553-2