Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Single Crystal and Polycrystalline Yttrium Aluminum Garnet
Polycrystalline neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), Nd: Y3Al5O12, has been produced in a transparent form and is being considered as a substitute for single crystal YAG in laser applications. To determine whether such a substitution could impact mechanical reliability, it is critical to c...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of applied ceramic technology Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 166 - 176 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.03.2006
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Polycrystalline neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), Nd: Y3Al5O12, has been produced in a transparent form and is being considered as a substitute for single crystal YAG in laser applications. To determine whether such a substitution could impact mechanical reliability, it is critical to compare the baseline mechanical properties of the single crystal and polycrystalline materials. In this study, elastic constants, hardness, fracture toughness and strength properties were measured using standard experimental procedures. In addition, fractography was used to gain insight into the fracture process and the nature of the flaws controlling the strength behavior. Overall, it was determined that the mechanical behavior of the polycrystalline YAG was very similar to that of the single crystal material. The elastic constants of polycrystalline YAG were almost the same as the single crystal and the polycrystalline material showed slight advantages in hardness and fracture toughness. Surface machining flaws were found to control the strength behavior with the single crystal material being the more sensitive to contact damage and, hence exhibiting a lower strength. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-49BXNW9R-M istex:9354310EBFDF5BB7BC4D4DD553959BB74572D3C1 ArticleID:IJAC02068 djg7@psu.edu * Supported in part by VLOC incorporated and in part through funding from VLOC contract #N66001‐00‐C‐6008 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1546-542X 1744-7402 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2006.02068.x |