Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Single Crystal and Polycrystalline Yttrium Aluminum Garnet

Polycrystalline neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), Nd: Y3Al5O12, has been produced in a transparent form and is being considered as a substitute for single crystal YAG in laser applications. To determine whether such a substitution could impact mechanical reliability, it is critical to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of applied ceramic technology Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 166 - 176
Main Authors Mezeix, Laurent, Green, David J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.03.2006
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Polycrystalline neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), Nd: Y3Al5O12, has been produced in a transparent form and is being considered as a substitute for single crystal YAG in laser applications. To determine whether such a substitution could impact mechanical reliability, it is critical to compare the baseline mechanical properties of the single crystal and polycrystalline materials. In this study, elastic constants, hardness, fracture toughness and strength properties were measured using standard experimental procedures. In addition, fractography was used to gain insight into the fracture process and the nature of the flaws controlling the strength behavior. Overall, it was determined that the mechanical behavior of the polycrystalline YAG was very similar to that of the single crystal material. The elastic constants of polycrystalline YAG were almost the same as the single crystal and the polycrystalline material showed slight advantages in hardness and fracture toughness. Surface machining flaws were found to control the strength behavior with the single crystal material being the more sensitive to contact damage and, hence exhibiting a lower strength.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-49BXNW9R-M
istex:9354310EBFDF5BB7BC4D4DD553959BB74572D3C1
ArticleID:IJAC02068
djg7@psu.edu
*
Supported in part by VLOC incorporated and in part through funding from VLOC contract #N66001‐00‐C‐6008
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1546-542X
1744-7402
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7402.2006.02068.x