Comparison of PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Statin‐Intolerant Patients: Design of the Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti‐PCSK9 Antibody in Statin‐Intolerant Subjects 3 (GAUSS‐3) Trial

Statins are the accepted standard for lowering low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). However, 5% to 10% of statin‐treated patients report intolerance, mostly due to muscle‐related adverse effects. Challenges exist to objective identification of statin‐intolerant patients. Evolocumab is a mono...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 137 - 144
Main Authors Nissen, Steven E., Dent‐Acosta, Ricardo E., Rosenson, Robert S., Stroes, Erik, Sattar, Naveed, Preiss, David, Mancini, G.B. John, Ballantyne, Christie M., Catapano, Alberico, Gouni‐Berthold, Ioanna, Stein, Evan A., Xue, Allen, Wasserman, Scott M., Scott, Rob, Thompson, Paul D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.03.2016
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Statins are the accepted standard for lowering low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). However, 5% to 10% of statin‐treated patients report intolerance, mostly due to muscle‐related adverse effects. Challenges exist to objective identification of statin‐intolerant patients. Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), resulting in marked LDL‐C reduction. We report the design of Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti‐PCSK9 Antibody in Statin‐Intolerant Subjects 3 (GAUSS‐3), a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, ezetimibe‐controlled study to compare effectiveness of 24 weeks of evolocumab 420 mg monthly vs ezetimibe 10 mg daily in hypercholesterolemic patients unable to tolerate an effective statin dose. The study incorporates a novel atorvastatin‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover phase to objectively identify statin intolerance. Eligible patients had LDL‐C above the National Cholesterol Education Project Adult Treatment Panel III target level for the appropriate coronary heart disease risk category and were unable to tolerate ≥3 statins or 2 statins (one of which was atorvastatin ≤10 mg/d) or had a history of marked creatine kinase elevation accompanied by muscle symptoms while on 1 statin. This trial has 2 co‐primary endpoints: mean percent change from baseline in LDL‐C at weeks 22 and 24 and percent change from baseline in LDL‐C at week 24. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include change from baseline in LDL‐C, percent of patients attaining LDL‐C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L), and percent change from baseline in total cholesterol, non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. Recruitment of 511 patients was completed on November 28, 2014.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMCID: PMC6490723
The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
The study was funded by Amgen, Inc.
Dr. Nissen reports that the Cleveland Clinic Center for Clinical Research receives funding to perform clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Inc., Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Novartis, Takeda, Orexigen, and Eli Lilly. Dr. Nissen is involved in these clinical trials but receives no personal remuneration for his participation. Dr. Nissen consults for many pharmaceutical companies, but he requires them to donate all honoraria or consulting fees directly to charity so that he receives neither income nor a tax deduction. Dr. Rosenson has participated on advisory boards for Akcea, Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, CVS Caremark, GSK, Regeneron, and Sanofi. Dr. Rosenson has received institutional research grants from Amgen, Inc., Catabasis, and Sanofi; honoraria from Kowa; and royalties from UpToDate, Inc. Dr. Stroes reports receiving (nonsubstantial) lecturing fees from Aegerion, Amgen, Inc., Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. Dr. Sattar has consulted for Amgen, Inc., Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly. Dr. Preiss has consulted for Sanofi during previous employment. Dr. Mancini reports consulting fees (modest) from Amgen, Inc., and Sanofi; honoraria (modest) from Amgen, Inc., Sanofi, Regeneron, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Merck; and research grants from Amgen, Inc. and Merck. Dr. Ballantyne has received research grants and consulting fees from Amgen, Inc., Abbott, Amarin, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Regeneron; consulting fees from Cerenis, Aegerion, Esperion, Kowa, Genzyme, and Arena; and research grants from Eli Lilly and GSK. Dr. Catapano has received lecturing fees from Amgen, Inc., Abbott, Genentech, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Regeneron; consulting fees from Aegerion, Kowa, Genzyme, and Merck; and research grants from Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Dr. Gouni‐Berthold has received lecturing and consulting fees from Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Genzyme, Eli Lilly, Chiesi, and GSK. Dr. Stein has received consulting fees from Amgen, Inc., BMS/Adnexus Therapeutics, Genentech, Regeneron, and Sanofi related to PCSK9 inhibitors and his institution has received research funding related to PCSK9 clinical trials from Amgen, Inc., Alnylam, BMS/Adnexus Therapeutics, Genentech, Sanofi, and Regeneron. Dr. Thompson has received research support from Genomas, Roche, Sanofi, Regeneron, Esperion, Amarin, and Pfizer; has served as a consultant for Amgen, Inc., Regeneron, Merck, Esperion, and Sanofi; has received speaker honoraria from Merck, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Amgen, Inc.; owns stock in AbbVie, Abbott Labs, CVS, General Electric, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and JA Willey; and has provided expert legal testimony on exercise‐related cardiac events and statin myopathy. Drs. Dent‐Acosta, Xue, Scott, Somaratne, and Wasserman are employees and stockholders of Amgen, Inc.
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.22518