Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging

• Published in: The American journal of surgery Vol. 198; no. 4; pp. 538 - 543
• Main Authors: Samphao, Srila, M.D, Wheeler, Amanda J., M.D, Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D, Michaelson, James S., Ph.D, Specht, Michelle C., M.D, Gadd, Michele A., M.D, Hughes, Kevin S., M.D, Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2009; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Age Factors; Biological and medical sciences; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis; Breast Neoplasms - genetics; Breasts; Cancer; Diagnosis; Digital mammography; Early Detection of Cancer; Female; General aspects; Genetic screening; Genetic Testing; Genetics; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Health risk assessment; Humans; Invasiveness; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mammary gland diseases; Mammography; Medical sciences; Ovarian cancer; Prevention and actions; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Surgery; Time Factors; Tumors; Young Adult; Young women; United States > US; Digital mammography; Breast cancer; Genetic testing; Magnetic resonance imaging; Young women; Breast disease; Predictive medicine; Delay; Result; Female; Genetics; Diagnosis; Mammary gland; Woman; Age; Human; Radiodiagnosis; Mammography; Digital image; Malignant tumor; Medical screening; Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; Mammary gland diseases; Genetic counseling; Treatment; Young adult; Breast; Medical imagery; Digital radiography; Cancer
• ISSN: 0002-9610; 1879-1883
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.010

Abstract Background The impact of newer breast imaging technologies and genetic testing on the detection of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger remains unknown. Methods A records review identified 628 women age 40 and younger diagnosed with breast cancer from 1996 to 2008. Patient and tumor characteristics, means of diagnosis, imaging results, and genetic testing were examined. Results Tumors were first detected by self-examination in 71%, with a median invasive tumor size of 2.0 cm. Imaging performed at or after diagnosis visualized most tumors; mammography visualized 86%, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visualized 96%, and mammography plus MRI visualized more than 98% of tumors. For 81% of patients, the mammogram at diagnosis was their first mammogram. Although 50% had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, few underwent genetic testing before their cancer diagnosis; 61 of 247 (25%) ultimately tested had a BRCA mutation. Conclusions Better use of genetic testing, mammography, and MRI could improve breast cancer detection in young women.