A pathway of targeted autophagy is induced by DNA damage in budding yeast

Autophagy plays a central role in the DNA damage response (DDR) by controlling the levels of various DNA repair and checkpoint proteins; however, how the DDR communicates with the autophagy pathway remains unknown. Using budding yeast, we demonstrate that global genotoxic damage or even a single unr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 114; no. 7; pp. E1158 - E1167
Main Authors Eapen, Vinay V., Waterman, David P., Bernard, Amélie, Schiffmann, Nathan, Sayas, Enrich, Kamber, Roarke, Lemos, Brenda, Memisoglu, Gonen, Ang, Jessie, Mazella, Allison, Chuartzman, Silvia G., Loewith, Robbie J., Schuldiner, Maya, Denic, Vladimir, Klionsky, Daniel J., Haber, James E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 14.02.2017
SeriesPNAS Plus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Autophagy plays a central role in the DNA damage response (DDR) by controlling the levels of various DNA repair and checkpoint proteins; however, how the DDR communicates with the autophagy pathway remains unknown. Using budding yeast, we demonstrate that global genotoxic damage or even a single unrepaired double-strand break (DSB) initiates a previously undescribed and selective pathway of autophagy that we term genotoxin-induced targeted autophagy (GTA). GTA requires the action primarily of Mec1/ATR and Rad53/CHEK2 checkpoint kinases, in part via transcriptional up-regulation of central autophagy proteins. GTA is distinct from starvation-induced autophagy. GTA requires Atg11, a central component of the selective autophagy machinery, but is different from previously described autophagy pathways. By screening a collection of ∼6,000 yeast mutants, we identified genes that control GTA but do not significantly affect rapamycin-induced autophagy. Overall, our findings establish a pathway of autophagy specific to the DNA damage response.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed by James E. Haber, December 5, 2016 (sent for review August 31, 2016; reviewed by Eric H. Baehrecke and Stephen J. Elledge)
Author contributions: V.V.E., D.P.W., A.B., E.S., R.K., B.L., G.M., R.J.L., M.S., V.D., D.J.K., and J.E.H. designed research; V.V.E., D.P.W., A.B., N.S., E.S., R.K., B.L., G.M., J.A., A.M., and S.G.C. performed research; V.V.E., D.P.W., A.B., N.S., E.S., R.K., B.L., G.M., J.A., S.G.C., R.J.L., M.S., V.D., D.J.K., and J.E.H. analyzed data; and V.V.E., D.P.W., A.B., R.J.L., M.S., V.D., D.J.K., and J.E.H. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: E.H.B., University of Massachusetts Medical School; S.J.E., Harvard Medical School.
1Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02115.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1614364114