Experts in fast-ball sports reduce anticipation timing cost by developing inhibitory control

• Published in: Brain and cognition Vol. 80; no. 1; pp. 23 - 32
• Main Authors: Nakamoto, Hiroki, Mori, Shiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01.10.2012; Elsevier
• Subjects: Activity levels. Psychomotricity; Adolescent; Applied psychology; Biological and medical sciences; Brain - physiology; Brain Hemisphere Functions; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Processes; Correlation; Diagnostic Tests; Electroencephalography; Error Correction; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Expertise; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Inhibition; Inhibition (Psychology); Male; Motion; Motor Reactions; Movement - physiology; Movement correction; Physics; Prediction; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychomotor activities; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Reaction Time - physiology; Reprogramming; Sports; Sports - physiology; Sports. Leisure; Stimuli; Task Analysis; Team Sports; Visual Perception - physiology; Young Adult; Reprogramming; Inhibition; Movement correction; Expertise; Sports; Human; Stimulus movement; Expert; Cognition; Anticipation; Experimental study; Motor program; Sport; Vision; Body movement; Perception; Timing; Motricity; Cognitive control
• ISSN: 0278-2626; 1090-2147
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.004

► Experts in fast ball sports adapt readily to changing environment. ► A better adaptation is due to efficient reprogramming of prepared motor output. ► Experts reveal augmented frontal activity in ERP after environmental changes. ► Experts replace inadequate commands with whole new commands by an inhibitory control. The present study was conducted to examine the relationship between expertise in movement correction and rate of movement reprogramming within limited time periods, and to clarify the specific cognitive processes regarding superior reprogramming ability in experts. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in baseball experts (n=7) and novices (n=7) while they completed a predictive task. The task was to manually press a button to coincide with the arrival of a moving target. The target moved at a constant velocity, and its velocity was suddenly decreased in some trials. Under changed velocity conditions, the baseball experts showed significantly smaller timing errors and a higher rate of timing reprogramming than the novices. Moreover, ERPs in baseball experts revealed faster central negative deflection and augmented frontal positive deflection at 200ms (N200) and 300ms (Pd300) after target deceleration, respectively. Following this, peak latency of the next positive component in the central region (P300b) was delayed. The negative deflection at 200ms, augmented frontal positive deflection, and late positive deflection at 300ms have been interpreted as reflecting stimulus detection, motor inhibition, and stimulus–response translation processes. Taken together, these findings suggest that the experts have developed movement reprogramming to avoid anticipation cost, and this is characterized by quick detection of target velocity change, stronger inhibition of the planned, incorrect response, and update of the stimulus–response relationship in the changed environment.