Monitoring of the Analytical Performance of Four Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Post-market Performance Follow-Up Study

• Published in: Diabetes therapy Vol. 15; no. 12; pp. 2525 - 2535
• Main Authors: Mader, Julia K., Baumstark, Annette, Tüting, Johannes, Sokol, Günter, Schuebel, Ruth, Tong, Yuhong, Roetschke, Julia, Slingerland, Robbert J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cheshire Springer Healthcare 01.12.2024; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Accuracy; Blood sugar; Cardiology; Diabetes; Diabetes therapy; Endocrinology; Glucose monitoring; Health aspects; Internal Medicine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Methods; Original Research; Patient monitoring; Physiological aspects; Netherlands; Austria; Germany; Accuracy; Safety; Blood glucose meter; Food and Drug Administration; ISO 15197; Post-market performance
• ISSN: 1869-6953; 1869-6961
• DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01665-9

Introduction A sizeable minority of commercially available blood glucose monitoring (BGM) systems fail to satisfy regulatory accuracy requirements, such as ISO 15197:2013, after approval. This study assessed whether the BGMs tested could consistently meet these ISO requirements by investigating their accuracy in a non-standardized setting. Methods In this 18-month post-market performance study, using the ISO criteria, healthcare professionals tested the accuracy of four CE-marked BGM systems (Roche Diabetes Care, Mannheim, Germany) on European adults with diabetes mellitus. ISO criteria included 95% of blood glucose (BG) values being within ± 15 mg/dl of a reference measurement for BG < 100 mg/dl or ± 15% for BG ≥ 100 mg/dl and, in the Parkes Consensus Error grid for type 1 diabetes comparing capillary BGM measurements versus reference method, 99% of BG values falling within zone A (no effect on clinical action or outcome) and zone B (altered clinical action with little or no effect on clinical outcome). Results BGM readings were obtained from 1650 participants, and the number of readings per BGM system was between 1712 and 2376. The percentage of BGM readings that fell within ISO 15197:2013 limits ranged from 99.4 to 99.9%. For all meter types, 100% of data points fell within zone A or zone B, and most data points for each meter (≥ 99.9%) were in zone A. Conclusion All four CE-marked BGM models showed results within the accuracy limits defined by ISO 15197 in a non-standardized setting and thus consistently met regulatory accuracy requirements.