Comparison between Vacuum-Assisted Closure Technique and Conventional Approach in Patients with Mediastinitis After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

• Published in: Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 353 - 359
• Main Authors: Akbayrak, Hakan, Tekumit, Hayrettin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Bacterial infections; Blood; Body mass index; CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods; Coronary vessels; Debridement; Gram-positive bacteria; Heart surgery; Humans; Infections; Leukocytes; Mediastinitis; Mediastinitis - etiology; Microorganisms; Mortality; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods; Original; Ostomy; Pathogens; Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Risk factors; Sternotomy; SURGERY; Treatment; Vacuum-Assisted Closure; Veins & arteries; Wound dehiscence; Wound healing; Coronary Artery Bypass; Treatment; Mediastinitis; Vacuum-Assisted Closure
• ISSN: 1678-9741; 0102-7638; 1678-9741
• DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0317

Median sternotomy is the most preferred approach in heart surgery. Post-sternotomy mediastinitis is a catastrophic and potentially life-threatening complication with an incidence rate of 0.15% to 5%, and its overall mortality rate reaches 47%. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of vacuum-assisted closure technique and the conventional methods on the management of mediastinitis following isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Between February 2001 and July 2013, 32,106 patients who underwent cardiac operations were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and fourteen patients who developed post-sternotomy mediastinitis were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups and compared - vacuum-assisted closure group (n=52, 45.6%) and conventional treatment group (n=62, 54.4%). There were no differences between the two groups according to the patients' characteristics, surgical data, and mediastinal cultures. However, we found that total treatment duration for post-sternotomy mediastinitis, time interval from diagnosis to negative culture, hospitalization time, and in-hospital mortality were statistically significantly lower in the vacuum-assisted closure group than in the conventional treatment group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.03, respectively). This study demonstrates that the vacuum-assisted closure technique improves the medical outcome of patients with post-sternotomy mediastinitis compared with the conventional treatment. The vacuum-assisted closure is a safe and more effective treatment modality for patients with post-sternotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery with reasonable morbidity and mortality.