Noradrenergic regulation of cue-guided decision making and impulsivity is doubly dissociable across frontal brain regions

• Published in: Psychopharmacology Vol. 241; no. 4; pp. 767 - 783
• Main Authors: Chernoff, Chloe S., Hynes, Tristan J., Schumacher, Jackson D., Ramaiah, Shrishti, Avramidis, Dimitrios K., Mortazavi, Leili, Floresco, Stan B., Winstanley, Catharine A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2024; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adrenergic receptors; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride - pharmacology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Brain; Care and treatment; Choice Behavior; Compulsive gambling; Cues; Decision Making; Female; Guanfacine; Guanfacine - pharmacology; Health aspects; Humans; Impulse; Impulsive behavior; Impulsive Behavior - physiology; Impulsivity; Innervation; Male; Neurosciences; Norepinephrine; Norepinephrine - pharmacology; Original Investigation; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Physiological aspects; Prefrontal Cortex; Psychiatry; Psychological aspects; Rats; Risk assessment; Canada; Orbitofrontal cortex; Impulsivity; Decision making; Prelimbic cortex; Rat gambling task; Prefrontal cortex; Noradrenaline
• ISSN: 0033-3158; 1432-2072; 1432-2072
• DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06508-2

Rationale Win-paired stimuli can promote risk taking in experimental gambling paradigms in both rats and humans. We previously demonstrated that atomoxetine, a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and guanfacine, a selective α2A adrenergic receptor agonist, reduced risk taking on the cued rat gambling task (crGT), a rodent assay of risky choice in which wins are accompanied by salient cues. Both compounds also decreased impulsive premature responding. Objective The key neural loci mediating these effects were unknown. The lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which are highly implicated in risk assessment, action selection, and impulse control, receive dense noradrenergic innervation. We therefore infused atomoxetine and guanfacine directly into either the lOFC or prelimbic (PrL) mPFC prior to task performance. Results When infused into the lOFC, atomoxetine improved decision making score and adaptive lose-shift behaviour in males, but not in females, without altering motor impulsivity. Conversely, intra-PrL atomoxetine improved impulse control in risk preferring animals of both sexes, but did not alter decision making. Guanfacine administered into the PrL, but not lOFC, also altered motor impulsivity in all subjects, though in the opposite direction to atomoxetine. Conclusions These data highlight a double dissociation between the behavioural effects of noradrenergic signaling across frontal regions with respect to risky choice and impulsive action. Given that the influence of noradrenergic manipulations on motor impulsivity could depend on baseline risk preference, these data also suggest that the noradrenaline system may function differently in subjects that are susceptible to the risk-promoting lure of win-associated cues.