Forensic analysis of Salvia divinorum using multivariate statistical procedures. Part I: discrimination from related Salvia species
Salvia divinorum is a hallucinogenic herb that is internationally regulated. In this study, salvinorin A, the active compound in S. divinorum , was extracted from S. divinorum plant leaves using a 5-min extraction with dichloromethane. Four additional Salvia species ( Salvia officinalis, Salvia guar...
Saved in:
Published in | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry Vol. 402; no. 2; pp. 833 - 842 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer-Verlag
2012
Springer |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Salvia divinorum
is a hallucinogenic herb that is internationally regulated. In this study, salvinorin A, the active compound in
S. divinorum
, was extracted from
S. divinorum
plant leaves using a 5-min extraction with dichloromethane. Four additional
Salvia
species (
Salvia officinalis, Salvia guaranitica
,
Salvia splendens
, and
Salvia nemorosa
) were extracted using this procedure, and all extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Differentiation of
S. divinorum
from other
Salvia
species was successful based on visual assessment of the resulting chromatograms. To provide a more objective comparison, the total ion chromatograms (TICs) were subjected to principal components analysis (PCA). Prior to PCA, the TICs were subjected to a series of data pretreatment procedures to minimize non-chemical sources of variance in the data set. Successful discrimination of
S. divinorum
from the other four
Salvia
species was possible based on visual assessment of the PCA scores plot. To provide a numerical assessment of the discrimination, a series of statistical procedures such as Euclidean distance measurement, hierarchical cluster analysis, Student’s
t
tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Pearson product moment correlation were also applied to the PCA scores. The statistical procedures were then compared to determine the advantages and disadvantages for forensic applications. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1618-2642 1618-2650 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00216-011-5479-0 |