School as a risk environment for children allergic to cats and a site for transfer of cat allergen to homes

• Published in: Journal of allergy and clinical immunology Vol. 103; no. 6; pp. 1012 - 1017
• Main Authors: Almqvist, Catarina, Larsson, Per H., Egmar, Ann-Charlotte, Hedrén, Marie, Malmberg, Per, Wickman, Magnus
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.06.1999; Elsevier
• Subjects: Air Pollutants - immunology; Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis; air sampling; Allergen; Allergens - analysis; Allergic diseases; Animals; Beds; Biological and medical sciences; cat; Cats - immunology; Child; clothes; Dust - analysis; Environment; Fel d 1; Glycoproteins - analysis; Humans; Immunopathology; Medical sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; pets; Respiratory and ent allergic diseases; Risk Factors; school; Schools; Surveys and Questionnaires; transfer; Sweden; Europe; pets; environment; transfer; school; cat; Fel d 1; air sampling; clothes; Allergen; Human; Fissipedia; Immunopathology; Allergy; Carnivora; Respiratory disease; Clothing; Exposure; School environment; Asthma; Vertebrata; School; Mammalia; Cat; Risk factor; Aeroallergen; Obstructive pulmonary disease; Child
• ISSN: 0091-6749; 1097-6825; 1097-6825
• DOI: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70172-7

Background: Many children are allergic to furred pets and avoid direct pet contact. The school may be a site of indirect exposure to pet allergens, which may induce or maintain symptoms of allergic diseases. Objective: We sought to investigate airborne levels of cat allergen (Fel d 1) at schools and in homes with or without cats and to study clothes as a route for dissemination of allergens between homes and school. Methods: Airborne cat allergen was collected with personal samplers from (1) children attending classes with many (>25%) or few (<10%) cat owners and (2) homes with or without cats. A recently developed amplified ELISA assay, which detects low levels of airborne cat allergen in pet-free environments, was used. Dust samples were collected from clothes and mattresses. Results: There was a 5-fold difference in the median levels of airborne cat allergen between classes with many and few cat owners (2.94 vs 0.59 ng/m 3; P < .001). The median airborne cat allergen concentration in classes with many cat owners was significantly higher than that found in the homes of non-cat owners ( P < .001) but lower than that found in homes with cats ( P < .001). Allergen levels in non-cat owners’ clothes increased after a school day ( P < .001). Non-cat owners in classes with many cat owners had higher levels of mattress-bound cat allergen ( P = .01). Conclusion: The results indicate significant exposure to cat allergen at school. Allergen is spread through clothing from homes with cats to classrooms. There the allergen is dispersed in air and contaminates the clothes of children without cats. The allergen levels in non-cat owners’ homes correlate with exposure to cat allergen at school. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:1012-7.)