Experiences of Patients With Rheumatic Diseases in the United States During Early Days of the COVID‐19 Pandemic
Objective Patients with rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and lupus have increased risk of infection and are treated with medications that may increase this risk yet are also hypothesized to help treat COVID‐19. We set out to understand how the COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted the l...
Saved in:
Published in | ACR open rheumatology Vol. 2; no. 6; pp. 335 - 343 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.06.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
Patients with rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and lupus have increased risk of infection and are treated with medications that may increase this risk yet are also hypothesized to help treat COVID‐19. We set out to understand how the COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted the lives of these patients in the United States.
Methods
Participants in a US‐wide longitudinal observational registry responded to a supplemental COVID‐19 questionnaire by e‐mail on March 25, 2020, about their symptoms, COVID‐19 testing, health care changes, and related experiences during the prior 2 weeks. Analysis compared responses by diagnosis, disease activity, and new onset of symptoms. Qualitative analysis was conducted on optional free‐text comment fields.
Results
Of the 7061 participants invited to participate, 530 responded, with RA as the most frequent diagnosis (61%). Eleven participants met COVID‐19 screening criteria, of whom two sought testing unsuccessfully. Six others sought testing, three of whom were successful, and all test results were negative. Not quite half of participants (42%) reported a change to their care in the prior 2 weeks. Qualitative analysis revealed four key themes: emotions in response to the pandemic, perceptions of risks from immunosuppressive medications, protective measures to reduce risk of COVID‐19 infection, and disruptions in accessing rheumatic disease medications, including hydroxychloroquine.
Conclusion
After 2 weeks, many participants with rheumatic diseases already had important changes to their health care, with many altering medications without professional consultation or because of hydroxychloroquine shortage. As evidence accumulates on the effectiveness of potential COVID‐19 treatments, effort is needed to safeguard access to established treatments for rheumatic diseases. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Dr. Michaud's work is supported by a research grant from the Rheumatology Research Foundation. Dr. England's work is supported by research grants from the Rheumatology Research Foundation and National Institute of General Medical Sciences–supported Great Plains Institutional Development Award for Clinical and Translational Research. Dr. Ogdie has received grants to the University of Pennsylvania from Pfizer and Novartis and to FORWARD Databank from Amgen. FORWARD receives research funding from Novartis, which is one of the manufacturers of hydroxychloroquine. Drs. Michaud and Wipfler contributed equally to this work. Ms. Simon has been a consultant and a prior employee for Bristol Meyers Squibb. Dr. Ogdie has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corrona, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, and her husband has received royalties from Novartis. No other disclosures relevant to this article were reported. |
ISSN: | 2578-5745 2578-5745 |
DOI: | 10.1002/acr2.11148 |