Virtual reality functional capacity assessment in schizophrenia: Preliminary data regarding feasibility and correlations with cognitive and functional capacity performance

Assessment of functional capacity is an intrinsic part of determining the functional relevance of response to treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Existing methods are highly and consistently correlated with performance on neuropsychological tests, but most current assessments of func...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSchizophrenia research. Cognition Vol. 1; no. 1; pp. e21 - e26
Main Authors Ruse, Stacy A., Harvey, Philip D., Davis, Vicki G., Atkins, Alexandra S., Fox, Kolleen H., Keefe, Richard S.E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Assessment of functional capacity is an intrinsic part of determining the functional relevance of response to treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Existing methods are highly and consistently correlated with performance on neuropsychological tests, but most current assessments of functional capacity are still paper and pencil simulations. We developed a computerized virtual reality assessment that contains all of the components of a shopping trip. We administered the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) to 54 healthy controls and to 51 people with schizophrenia to test its feasibility. Dependent variables for the VRFCAT included time to completion and errors on 12 objectives and the number of times that an individual failed to complete an objective. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and a standard functional capacity measure, the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B), were administered to the patients with schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia performed more poorly than healthy controls on 10/11 of the time variables, as well as 2/12 error scores and 2/12 failed objectives. Pearson correlations for 7 of 15 VRFCAT variables with MCCB composite scores were statistically significant. These results provide support for the possibility of computerized functional capacity assessment, but more substantial studies are required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2215-0013
2215-0013
DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2014.01.004