Early intervention with azelastine nasal spray may reduce viral load in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

With the changing epidemiology of COVID-19 and its impact on our daily lives, there is still an unmet need of COVID-19 therapies treating early infections to prevent progression. The current study was a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ninety SARS-CoV-2 positive patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 6839 - 12
Main Authors Klussmann, Jens Peter, Grosheva, Maria, Meiser, Peter, Lehmann, Clara, Nagy, Eszter, Szijártó, Valéria, Nagy, Gábor, Konrat, Robert, Flegel, Michael, Holzer, Frank, Groß, Dorothea, Steinmetz, Charlotte, Scherer, Barbara, Gruell, Henning, Schlotz, Maike, Klein, Florian, de Aragão, Paula Aguiar, Morr, Henning, Al Saleh, Helal, Bilstein, Andreas, Russo, Belisa, Müller-Scholtz, Susanne, Acikel, Cengizhan, Sahin, Hacer, Werkhäuser, Nina, Allekotte, Silke, Mösges, Ralph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 26.04.2023
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-023-32546-z

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With the changing epidemiology of COVID-19 and its impact on our daily lives, there is still an unmet need of COVID-19 therapies treating early infections to prevent progression. The current study was a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ninety SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were randomized into 3 groups receiving placebo, 0.02% or 0.1% azelastine nasal spray for 11 days, during which viral loads were assessed by quantitative PCR. Investigators assessed patients’ status throughout the trial including safety follow-ups (days 16 and 60). Symptoms were documented in patient diaries. Initial viral loads were log 10 6.85 ± 1.31 (mean ± SD) copies/mL (ORF 1a/b gene). After treatment, virus load was reduced in all groups ( p  < 0.0001) but was greater in the 0.1% group compared to placebo ( p  = 0.007). In a subset of patients (initial Ct < 25) viral load was strongly reduced on day 4 in the 0.1% group compared to placebo ( p  = 0.005). Negative PCR results appeared earlier and more frequently in the azelastine treated groups: being 18.52% and 21.43% in the 0.1% and 0.02% groups, respectively, compared to 0% for placebo on day 8. Comparable numbers of adverse events occurred in all treatment groups with no safety concerns. The shown effects of azelastine nasal spray may thus be suggestive of azelastine’s potential as an antiviral treatment. Trial registration: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00024520; Date of Registration in DRKS: 12/02/2021). EudraCT number: 2020-005544-34.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-32546-z