Calculating gait kinematics using MR-based kinematic models

• Published in: Gait & posture Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 158 - 164
• Main Authors: Scheys, Lennart, Desloovere, Kaat, Spaepen, Arthur, Suetens, Paul, Jonkers, Ilse
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier B.V 01.02.2011
• Subjects: Biomechanical Phenomena; Cerebral palsy; Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology; Child; Female; Gait; Gait - physiology; Hip Joint - physiology; Humans; Inverse kinematics; Knee Joint - physiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Models, Biological; Orthopedics; Subject-specific kinematic models; Cerebral palsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gait; Subject-specific kinematic models; Inverse kinematics
• ISSN: 0966-6362; 1879-2219; 1879-2219
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.003

Rescaling generic models is the most frequently applied approach in generating biomechanical models for inverse kinematics. Nevertheless it is well known that this procedure introduces errors in calculated gait kinematics due to: (1) errors associated with palpation of anatomical landmarks, (2) inaccuracies in the definition of joint coordinate systems. Based on magnetic resonance (MR) images, more accurate, subject-specific kinematic models can be built that are significantly less sensitive to both error types. We studied the difference between the two modelling techniques by quantifying differences in calculated hip and knee joint kinematics during gait. In a clinically relevant patient group of 7 pediatric cerebral palsy (CP) subjects with increased femoral anteversion, gait kinematic were calculated using (1) rescaled generic kinematic models and (2) subject-specific MR-based models. In addition, both sets of kinematics were compared to those obtained using the standard clinical data processing workflow. Inverse kinematics, calculated using rescaled generic models or the standard clinical workflow, differed largely compared to kinematics calculated using subject-specific MR-based kinematic models. The kinematic differences were most pronounced in the sagittal and transverse planes (hip and knee flexion, hip rotation). This study shows that MR-based kinematic models improve the reliability of gait kinematics, compared to generic models based on normal subjects. This is the case especially in CP subjects where bony deformations may alter the relative configuration of joint coordinate systems. Whilst high cost impedes the implementation of this modeling technique, our results demonstrate that efforts should be made to improve the level of subject-specific detail in the joint axes determination.