Retinal “sweet spot” for myopia treatment

We studied which retinal area controls short-term axial eye shortening when human subjects were exposed to + 3.0D monocular defocus. A custom-built infrared eye tracker recorded the point of fixation while subjects watched a movie at a 2 m distance. The eye tracker software accessed each individual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 26773 - 10
Main Authors Swiatczak, Barbara, Scholl, Hendrik P. N., Schaeffel, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 05.11.2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We studied which retinal area controls short-term axial eye shortening when human subjects were exposed to + 3.0D monocular defocus. A custom-built infrared eye tracker recorded the point of fixation while subjects watched a movie at a 2 m distance. The eye tracker software accessed each individual movie frame in real-time and covered the points of fixation in the movie with a uniform grey patch. Four patches were programmed: (1) foveal patch (0–3 degrees), (2) annular patch (3–9 deg), (3) foveal patch (0–3 deg) combined with an annular patch (6–9 deg), and (4) full-field patch where only 6–10 deg were exposed to the defocus. Axial eye shortening was elicited similarly with full-field positive defocus and with the foveal patch, indicating that the fovea made only a minor contribution (-11 ± 12 μm vs. -14 ± 17 μm, respectively, n.s.). In contrast, patching a 3–9 degrees annular area or fovea together with an annular area of 6–9 degrees, completely suppressed the effect when compared with full-field defocus (+ 3 ± 1 μm or -2 ± 13 μm vs. -11 ± 12 μm, respectively, p  < 0.001). Finally, we found that the near-peripheral retina (6–10 degrees) is a “sweet spot” for positive defocus detection and alone can regulate eye growth control mechanism, and perhaps long-term refractive development (-9 ± 8 μm vs. full-field: -11 ± 12 μm, n.s.).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-78300-x