Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from agricultural by-product/waste

Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from Ceiba pentandra hulls, Phaseolus aureus hulls and Cicer arietinum waste was investigated. The influence of various parameters such as effect of pH, contact time, initial metal ion concentration and adsorbent dose for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental management Vol. 90; no. 1; pp. 634 - 643
Main Authors Rao, M. Madhava, Reddy, D.H.K. Kumar, Venkateswarlu, Padala, Seshaiah, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 2009
Elsevier
Academic Press Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from Ceiba pentandra hulls, Phaseolus aureus hulls and Cicer arietinum waste was investigated. The influence of various parameters such as effect of pH, contact time, initial metal ion concentration and adsorbent dose for the removal of mercury was studied using a batch process. The experiments demonstrated that the adsorption process corresponds to the pseudo-second-order-kinetic models and the equilibrium adsorption data fit the Freundlich isotherm model well. The prepared adsorbents ACCPH, ACPAH and ACCAW had removal capacities of 25.88 mg/g, 23.66 mg/g and 22.88 mg/g, respectively, at an initial Hg(II) concentration of 40 mg/L. The order of Hg(II) removal capacities of these three adsorbents was ACCPH > ACPAH > ACCAW. The adsorption behavior of the activated carbon is explained on the basis of its chemical nature. The feasibility of regeneration of spent activated carbon adsorbents for recovery of Hg(II) and reuse of the adsorbent was determined using HCl solution.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.019
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-4797
1095-8630
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.019