Is there an association between molar incisor hypomineralization and developmental dental anomalies? A case-control study

• Published in: BMC oral health Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 776
• Main Authors: Åen Yavuz, Betül, Sezer, Berkant, Kaya, Remziye, TuÄcu, Nihan, Kargül, Betül
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 21.10.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abnormalities; Biomineralization; Children; Dental enamel; Dentistry; Developmental dental anomalies; Epigenetics; Etiology; Families & family life; Health aspects; Incisors; Maxilla; Mineralization; Molar incisor hypomineralization; Molars; Mutation; Orthodontics; Panoramic radiograph; Pediatric research; Pediatrics; Sample size; Statistical analysis; Teeth; Turkey
• ISSN: 1472-6831; 1472-6831
• DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03540-8

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any association between molar incisor hypomineralization and developmental dental anomalies. Methods Two pediatric dentists evaluated panoramic radiographs of 429 children aged 8–14 years with molar incisor hypomineralization (study group) and 437 children without molar incisor hypomineralization (control group) in terms of developmental dental anomalies. Twelve different developmental dental anomalies were categorized into four types: size (microdontia, macrodontia); position (ectopic eruption of maxillary permanent first molars, infraocclusion of primary molars); shape (fusion, gemination, dilaceration, taurodontism, peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors); and number (hypodontia, oligodontia, hyperdontia) anomalies. Results No significant difference was observed in the frequencies of developmental dental anomalies between the study and control groups in total, females, and males (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the distribution of developmental size, position, shape, and number anomalies between the study and control groups (p = 0.024). The most common anomaly in both groups was hypodontia (6.3% and 5.9%, respectively). There was a significant difference between the study and control groups in terms of subtypes of shape anomaly in all children and females (p = 0.045 and p = 0.05, respectively). Conclusions While a significant difference was observed between the distributions of types of developmental dental anomalies between individuals with and without molar incisor hypomineralization, there was no difference in terms of the frequency of developmental dental anomalies.